These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24675196)

  • 41. Navigating the qualitative manuscript writing process: some tips for authors and reviewers.
    Roberts C; Kumar K; Finn G
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):439. PubMed ID: 33198740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Getting published well requires fulfilling editors' and reviewers' needs and desires.
    Schoenwolf GC
    Dev Growth Differ; 2013 Dec; 55(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 24131034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician.
    Green R; Del Mar C
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Aug; 35(8):655-6. PubMed ID: 16915616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reasons for unsuccessful research submissions to JAAPA.
    Reed H; Dehn RW; Bushardt RL
    JAAPA; 2022 May; 35(5):54-56. PubMed ID: 35421874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.
    Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.
    Oldham MA; Kontos N; Baller E; Cerimele JM
    J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry; 2023; 64(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 36796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tips and tricks for how to become a good reviewer.
    Hughes JD; Cristiani R; Hirschmann MT; Musahl V; Eriksson K; Karlsson J
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Nov; 31(11):4631-4636. PubMed ID: 37792083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication.
    Pierson DJ
    Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 15447812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [How to write and publish a scientific article in stomatology].
    Gao XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 52(12):758-761. PubMed ID: 29275572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Steps to Getting Your Manuscript Published in a High-Quality Medical Journal.
    Balch CM; McMasters KM; Klimberg VS; Pawlik TM; Posner MC; Roh M; Tanabe KK; Whippen D; Ikoma N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):850-855. PubMed ID: 29349528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Peer review? No thanks!
    Castelo-Branco C
    Climacteric; 2023 Feb; 26(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 36420749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
    Loonen MP; Hage JJ; Kon M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1461-72; discussion 1473-5. PubMed ID: 16217496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How well does a journal's peer review process function? A survey of authors' opinions.
    Sweitzer BJ; Cullen DJ
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 8015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
    Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [How to write a scientific paper].
    Parati G; Valentini M
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2005 Apr; 6(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 15902941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts.
    Hausmann L; Schweitzer B; Middleton FA; Schulz JB
    J Neurochem; 2018 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 29377133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.