These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24676579)

  • 21. Evaluation of the centreing ability of the ProTaper Universal rotary system in curved roots in comparison to Nitiflex files.
    Aguiar CM; de Andrade Mendes D; Câmara AC; de Figueiredo JA
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Dec; 35(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 19961458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vitro comparison of Profile GT and GTX nickel-titanium rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in mandibular molar.
    Iqbal MK; Floratos S; Hsu YK; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20113795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of influence of flexion angles of files in apical stop preparation by using manual and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Pereira AG; Fagundes dos Santos RM; Mendes Azevedo KC; Raposo LH; Biffi JC
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1383-6. PubMed ID: 22980183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
    Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Iqbal MK; Firic S; Tulcan J; Karabucak B; Kim S
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jun; 37(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 15186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
    Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
    J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.
    Schmitz Mda S; Santos R; Capelli A; Jacobovitz M; Spanó JC; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 18949299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In vitro comparison in a manikin model: increasing apical enlargement with K3 and K3XF rotary instruments.
    Olivieri JG; Stöber E; García Font M; González JA; Bragado P; Roig M; Duran-Sindreu F
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1463-7. PubMed ID: 25146034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of Cervical and Apical Enlargement Associated with the WaveOne System on the Transportation and Centralization of Endodontic Preparations.
    Jatahy Ferreira do Amaral RO; Leonardi DP; Gabardo MC; Coelho BS; Oliveira KV; Baratto Filho F
    J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):626-31. PubMed ID: 26794342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in maxillary molars: SEM analysis.
    Vanni JR; Santos R; Limongi O; Guerisoli DM; Capelli A; Pécora JD
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 16429181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
    Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
    Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
    Liu W; Wu B
    J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical transportation in curved root canals instrumented by reciprocating file systems.
    Barbieri N; Leonardi DP; Baechtold MS; Correr GM; Gabardo MC; Zielak JC; Baratto-Filho F
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15():149. PubMed ID: 26593244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
    Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and RaCe rotary instruments.
    García M; Duran-Sindreu F; Mercadé M; Bueno R; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):990-2. PubMed ID: 22703667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.