These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24677314)

  • 1. The effects of a soft drink tax in the UK.
    Tiffin R; Kehlbacher A; Salois M
    Health Econ; 2015 May; 24(5):583-600. PubMed ID: 24677314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of increasing the price of sugar-sweetened beverages on alcoholic beverage purchases: an economic analysis of sales data.
    Quirmbach D; Cornelsen L; Jebb SA; Marteau T; Smith R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2018 Apr; 72(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 29363613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association between tax on sugar sweetened beverages and soft drink consumption in adults in Mexico: open cohort longitudinal analysis of Health Workers Cohort Study.
    Sánchez-Romero LM; Canto-Osorio F; González-Morales R; Colchero MA; Ng SW; Ramírez-Palacios P; Salmerón J; Barrientos-Gutiérrez T
    BMJ; 2020 May; 369():m1311. PubMed ID: 32376605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study.
    Briggs AD; Mytton OT; Kehlbacher A; Tiffin R; Rayner M; Scarborough P
    BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f6189. PubMed ID: 24179043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of 'Traffic-Light' nutritional labelling in carbonated soft drink purchases in Ecuador.
    Sandoval LA; Carpio CE; Sanchez-Plata M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222866. PubMed ID: 31581272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do prices and purchases respond similarly to soft drink tax increases and cuts?
    Schmacker R; Smed S
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100864. PubMed ID: 32145515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do High Consumers of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Respond Differently to Price Changes? A Finite Mixture IV-Tobit Approach.
    Etilé F; Sharma A
    Health Econ; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1147-63. PubMed ID: 25676493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International application of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation in obesity reduction: factors that may influence policy effectiveness in country-specific contexts.
    Jou J; Techakehakij W
    Health Policy; 2012 Sep; 107(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22727243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages across different income groups.
    Sharma A; Hauck K; Hollingsworth B; Siciliani L
    Health Econ; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1159-84. PubMed ID: 24895084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State sales tax rates for soft drinks and snacks sold through grocery stores and vending machines, 2007.
    Chriqui JF; Eidson SS; Bates H; Kowalczyk S; Chaloupka FJ
    J Public Health Policy; 2008 Jul; 29(2):226-49. PubMed ID: 18523476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of UK soft drinks industry levy on manufacturers' domestic turnover.
    Law C; Cornelsen L; Adams J; Pell D; Rutter H; White M; Smith R
    Econ Hum Biol; 2020 May; 37():100866. PubMed ID: 32224445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to combat the U.S. obesity problem.
    Dharmasena S; Capps O
    Health Econ; 2012 Jun; 21(6):669-94. PubMed ID: 21538676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The UK sugar tax - a healthy start?
    Jones CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Jul; 221(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 27444594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the EU sugar policy reform increase added sugar consumption? An empirical evidence on the soft drink market.
    Bonnet C; Requillart V
    Health Econ; 2011 Sep; 20(9):1012-24. PubMed ID: 21322088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study.
    Pell D; Penney T; Hammond D; Vanderlee L; White M; Adams J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e026698. PubMed ID: 30827952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft drinks industry accuses doctors of having financial interest in pushing for sugar tax.
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6779. PubMed ID: 26670736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children.
    Cawley J; Frisvold D; Hill A; Jones D
    J Health Econ; 2019 Sep; 67():102225. PubMed ID: 31476602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taxing soft drinks in the Pacific: implementation lessons for improving health.
    Thow AM; Quested C; Juventin L; Kun R; Khan AN; Swinburn B
    Health Promot Int; 2011 Mar; 26(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 20739326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the French soda tax on prices and purchases. An ex post evaluation.
    Capacci S; Allais O; Bonnet C; Mazzocchi M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223196. PubMed ID: 31603901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile.
    Guerrero-López CM; Unar-Munguía M; Colchero MA
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 28183287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.