BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24677372)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of sequence covariation methods to mine evolutionary hubs: examples from selected GPCR families.
    Pelé J; Moreau M; Abdi H; Rodien P; Castel H; Chabbert M
    Proteins; 2014 Sep; 82(9):2141-56. PubMed ID: 24677372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contributions of residue pairing to beta-sheet formation: conservation and covariation of amino acid residue pairs on antiparallel beta-strands.
    Mandel-Gutfreund Y; Zaremba SM; Gregoret LM
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 305(5):1145-59. PubMed ID: 11162120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions.
    Larson SM; Di Nardo AA; Davidson AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Oct; 303(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 11031119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure-Based Sequence Alignment of the Transmembrane Domains of All Human GPCRs: Phylogenetic, Structural and Functional Implications.
    Cvicek V; Goddard WA; Abrol R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004805. PubMed ID: 27028541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction.
    Dunn SD; Wahl LM; Gloor GB
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 18057019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genome wide survey of G protein-coupled receptors in Tetraodon nigroviridis.
    Metpally RP; Sowdhamini R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 5():41. PubMed ID: 16022726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functionally compensating coevolving positions are neither homoplasic nor conserved in clades.
    Gloor GB; Tyagi G; Abrassart DM; Kingston AJ; Fernandes AD; Dunn SD; Brandl CJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):1181-91. PubMed ID: 20065119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intramolecular allosteric communication in dopamine D2 receptor revealed by evolutionary amino acid covariation.
    Sung YM; Wilkins AD; Rodriguez GJ; Wensel TG; Lichtarge O
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):3539-44. PubMed ID: 26979958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical analysis and prediction of functional residues effective for GPCR-G-protein coupling selectivity.
    Muramatsu T; Suwa M
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2006 Jun; 19(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 16565146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CovET: A covariation-evolutionary trace method that identifies protein structure-function modules.
    Konecki DM; Hamrick S; Wang C; Agosto MA; Wensel TG; Lichtarge O
    J Biol Chem; 2023 Jul; 299(7):104896. PubMed ID: 37290531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. G protein-coupled time travel: evolutionary aspects of GPCR research.
    Römpler H; Stäubert C; Thor D; Schulz A; Hofreiter M; Schöneberg T
    Mol Interv; 2007 Feb; 7(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17339603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of the class C GPCR Venus flytrap modules involved positive selected functional divergence.
    Cao J; Huang S; Qian J; Huang J; Jin L; Su Z; Yang J; Liu J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Mar; 9():67. PubMed ID: 19323848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amino acid positions subject to multiple coevolutionary constraints can be robustly identified by their eigenvector network centrality scores.
    Parente DJ; Ray JC; Swint-Kruse L
    Proteins; 2015 Dec; 83(12):2293-306. PubMed ID: 26503808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ConSurf-HSSP database: the mapping of evolutionary conservation among homologs onto PDB structures.
    Glaser F; Rosenberg Y; Kessel A; Pupko T; Ben-Tal N
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):610-7. PubMed ID: 15614759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A perturbation-based method for calculating explicit likelihood of evolutionary co-variance in multiple sequence alignments.
    Dekker JP; Fodor A; Aldrich RW; Yellen G
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 20(10):1565-72. PubMed ID: 14962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational studies of Family A and Family B GPCRs.
    Vohra S; Chintapalli SV; Illingworth CJ; Reeves PJ; Mullineaux PM; Clark HS; Dean MK; Upton GJ; Reynolds CA
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2007 Aug; 35(Pt 4):749-54. PubMed ID: 17635140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of pairwise residue proximity by covariation analysis for 3D-structure prediction of G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Nemoto W; Imai T; Takahashi T; Kikuchi T; Fujita N
    Protein J; 2004 Aug; 23(6):427-35. PubMed ID: 15517989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting compensatory covariation signals in protein evolution using reconstructed ancestral sequences.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Schreiber DR; Benner SA
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Jun; 319(3):729-43. PubMed ID: 12054866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioinformatics tools for predicting GPCR gene functions.
    Suwa M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 796():205-24. PubMed ID: 24158807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.