These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24677431)

  • 1. Difficult name, cold man: Chinese names, gender stereotypicality and trustworthiness.
    Du X; Dong M; Gu D; Xin Z; Jiang J; Sun Y
    Int J Psychol; 2021 Jun; 56(3):349-360. PubMed ID: 33283905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency.
    Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jun; 103(24):9369-72. PubMed ID: 16754871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.
    Heller D; Gorman KS; Tanenhaus MK
    Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 4(2):290-305. PubMed ID: 22389094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Krockow EM
    JAC Antimicrob Resist; 2020 Sep; 2(3):dlaa067. PubMed ID: 34192252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental Study of the Promotional Implications of Proprietary Prescription Drug Names.
    Peinado S; O'Donoghue AC; Betts KR; Paquin RS; Giombi K; Arnold JE; Kelly BJ; Davis C
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39341979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confusing the drug facts on one nonprescription drug label with those on another: The Drug Facts Label as a text schema.
    Ryan MP; Costello-White RN; Sandoval MN
    Health Psychol Open; 2016 Jan; 3(1):2055102916641955. PubMed ID: 28070399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision Aids: The Effect of Labeling Options on Patient Choices and Decision Making.
    Dolan JG; Cherkasky OA; Chin N; Veazie PJ
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):979-86. PubMed ID: 26229084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluent processing leads to positive stimulus evaluations even when base rates suggest negative evaluations.
    Silva RR; Unkelbach C
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Nov; 96():103238. PubMed ID: 34784558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nomen est omen? How and when company name fluency affects return expectations.
    Fenneman A; Janssen DJ; Nolte S; Zeisberger S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287995. PubMed ID: 37585410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The malleable effect of name fluency on pharmaceutical drug perception.
    Cho H
    J Health Psychol; 2015 Oct; 20(10):1369-74. PubMed ID: 24677431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dark side of fluency: Fluent names increase drug dosing.
    Dohle S; Montoya AK
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 28639797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. If It's Difficult to Pronounce, It Might Not Be Risky: The Effect of Fluency on Judgment of Risk Does Not Generalize to New Stimuli.
    Bahník Š; Vranka MA
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Apr; 28(4):427-436. PubMed ID: 28406381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.