These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24677497)

  • 1. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in endometrial carcinoma: effect of region of interest methods on ADC values.
    Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 40(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 24677497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in ovarian tumor: Effect of region-of-interest methods on ADC values and diagnostic ability.
    Mukuda N; Fujii S; Inoue C; Fukunaga T; Tanabe Y; Itamochi H; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):720-5. PubMed ID: 26201495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of testicular germ cell neoplasms: Effect of ROI methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values and interobserver variability.
    Tsili AC; Ntorkou A; Astrakas L; Xydis V; Tsampalas S; Sofikitis N; Argyropoulou MI
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():1-6. PubMed ID: 28267523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study of the effect of region of interest on ADC values and interobserver variability.
    Ma C; Liu L; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 26182908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.
    Han X; Suo S; Sun Y; Zu J; Qu J; Zhou Y; Chen Z; Xu J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):722-730. PubMed ID: 27527072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters of endometrioid carcinoma.
    Inoue C; Fujii S; Kaneda S; Fukunaga T; Kaminou T; Kigawa J; Harada T; Ogawa T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 24339027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semiquantitative perfusion combined with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pre-operative evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results in a group of 57 patients.
    Ippolito D; Cadonici A; Bonaffini PA; Minutolo O; Casiraghi A; Perego P; Sironi S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):464-72. PubMed ID: 24629513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of diffusion-weighted MRI in endometrial cancer: a preliminary correlation study with histological grade.
    Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 24316663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
    Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
    Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant hepatic tumors: effect of DWI techniques and calculation methods.
    Kim SY; Lee SS; Park B; Kim N; Kim JK; Park SH; Byun JH; Song KJ; Koo JH; Choi EK; Lee MG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1131-8. PubMed ID: 22777895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?
    Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Duerr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 25148160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
    Kim SY; Lee SS; Byun JH; Park SH; Kim JK; Park B; Kim N; Lee MG
    Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):815-23. PubMed ID: 20501719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion-weighted quantitative MRI of pleural abnormalities: Intra- and interobserver variability in the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements.
    Priola AM; Priola SM; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Brundu M; Righi L; Veltri A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 28117923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.
    Xu XQ; Hu H; Su GY; Liu H; Shi HB; Wu FY
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(5):650-6. PubMed ID: 27587953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of regions of interest methods on apparent coefficient measurement of the parotid gland in early Sjögren's syndrome at 3T MRI.
    Xu X; Su G; Hu H; Wang Y; Hong X; Shi H; Wu F
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 26987670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging--preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Matoba M; Tonami H; Kondou T; Yokota H; Higashi K; Toga H; Sakuma T
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):570-7. PubMed ID: 17400757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative comparison of MR diffusion-weighted imaging for liver focal lesions between 3.0T and 1.5T: Regions of interest of the minimum-spot ADC, the largest possible solid part, and the maximum diameter in lesions.
    Tang Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Li J; Jia R; Ma L; Ye H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1320-1329. PubMed ID: 27080350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
    Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Three Techniques of ROI Placement for ADC Measurements in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
    Liu L; Ma C; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1385-92. PubMed ID: 26292914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.