These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24677497)
21. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Three Techniques of ROI Placement for ADC Measurements in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Liu L; Ma C; Li J; Wang L; Chen LG; Zhang Y; Chen SY; Lu JP Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1385-92. PubMed ID: 26292914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements. Ahlawat S; Khandheria P; Del Grande F; Morelli J; Subhawong TK; Demehri S; Fayad LM J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 26174705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging. Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the pancreas, pancreas carcinoma, and mass-forming focal pancreatitis. Wiggermann P; Grützmann R; Weissenböck A; Kamusella P; Dittert DD; Stroszczynski C Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 22262868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability. Nogueira L; Brandão S; Matos E; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25698095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation between two-point and multipoint B value analyses in prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue at 3 T: preliminary experience. Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Kwon GY AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W287-94. PubMed ID: 25148186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability. Lambregts DM; Beets GL; Maas M; Curvo-Semedo L; Kessels AG; Thywissen T; Beets-Tan RG Eur Radiol; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2567-74. PubMed ID: 21822946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning. Priola AM; Priola SM; Parlatano D; Gned D; Giraudo MT; Giardino R; Ferrero B; Ardissone F; Veltri A Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1386-1394. PubMed ID: 27516357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endometrial cancer: utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression at 3T. Seo JM; Kim CK; Choi D; Kwan Park B J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 37(5):1151-9. PubMed ID: 23150461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest. Arponen O; Sudah M; Masarwah A; Taina M; Rautiainen S; Könönen M; Sironen R; Kosma VM; Sutela A; Hakumäki J; Vanninen R PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0138702. PubMed ID: 26458106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values. Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Braithwaite AC; Dale BM; Boll DT; Merkle EM Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19095786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diffusion volume (DV) measurement in endometrial and cervical cancer: A new MRI parameter in the evaluation of the tumor grading and the risk classification. Mainenti PP; Pizzuti LM; Segreto S; Comerci M; Fronzo S; Romano F; Crisci V; Smaldone M; Laccetti E; Storto G; Alfano B; Maurea S; Salvatore M; Pace L Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 26724655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered techniques. Chen X; Qin L; Pan D; Huang Y; Yan L; Wang G; Liu Y; Liang C; Liu Z Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 24475860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging. Giannotti E; Waugh S; Priba L; Davis Z; Crowe E; Vinnicombe S Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1729-36. PubMed ID: 26078100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantified ADC histogram analysis: a new method for differentiating mass-forming focal pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer. Ma X; Zhao X; Ouyang H; Sun F; Zhang H; Zhou C Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24167322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of region of interest size on ADC measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ma C; Guo X; Liu L; Zhan Q; Li J; Zhu C; Wang L; Zhang J; Fang X; Qu J; Chen S; Shao C; Lu JP Cancer Imaging; 2017 May; 17(1):13. PubMed ID: 28464866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative Assessment of Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging. Blazic IM; Lilic GB; Gajic MM Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):418-428. PubMed ID: 27253423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Method Versus a Traditional 2-Dimensional Measurement Method for Identifying Non-Puerperal Mastitis From Breast Cancer at 3.0 T. Tang Q; Li Q; Xie D; Chu K; Liu L; Liao C; Qin Y; Wang Z; Su D J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(5):776-783. PubMed ID: 29787501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]