BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24678896)

  • 1. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
    Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).
    Sali L; Grazzini G; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Ventura L; Regge D; Zappa M; Mascalchi M; Milani S
    Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():74. PubMed ID: 23497601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Segnan N; Correale L; Hassan C; Arrigoni A; Asnaghi R; Bestagini P; Bulighin G; Cassinis MC; Ederle A; Ferraris A; Galatola G; Gallo T; Gandini G; Garretti L; Martina MC; Molinar D; Montemezzi S; Morra L; Motton M; Occhipinti P; Pinali L; Soardi GA; Senore C
    Gut; 2017 Aug; 66(8):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 27196588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; de Haan MC; Stoop EM; Deutekom M; Fockens P; Bossuyt PM; Thomeer M; van Ballegooijen M; Essink-Bot ML; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 10():47. PubMed ID: 20482825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
    Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
    Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials).
    Halligan S; Dadswell E; Wooldrage K; Wardle J; von Wagner C; Lilford R; Yao GL; Zhu S; Atkin W
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jul; 19(54):1-134. PubMed ID: 26198205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Options for screening for colorectal cancer.
    Atkin W
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 2003; (237):13-6. PubMed ID: 12797674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost analysis of colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography in Italy.
    Mantellini P; Lippi G; Sali L; Grazzini G; Delsanto S; Mallardi B; Falchini M; Castiglione G; Carozzi FM; Mascalchi M; Milani S; Ventura L; Zappa M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jun; 19(5):735-746. PubMed ID: 28681075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice.
    Multicentre Australian Colorectal-neoplasia Screening (MACS) Group
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(11):546-50. PubMed ID: 16768659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
    Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test.
    Senore C; Hassan C; Regge D; Pagano E; Iussich G; Correale L; Segnan N
    J Med Screen; 2019 Jun; 26(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 30180780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
    Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
    Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
    Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is whole-colon investigation by colonoscopy, computerised tomography colonography or barium enema necessary for all patients with colorectal cancer symptoms, and for which patients would flexible sigmoidoscopy suffice? A retrospective cohort study.
    Atkin W; Wooldrage K; Shah U; Skinner K; Brown JP; Hamilton W; Kralj-Hans I; Thompson MR; Flashman KG; Halligan S; Thomas-Gibson S; Vance M; Cross AJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Nov; 21(66):1-80. PubMed ID: 29153075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
    Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.
    Segnan N; Senore C; Andreoni B; Arrigoni A; Bisanti L; Cardelli A; Castiglione G; Crosta C; DiPlacido R; Ferrari A; Ferraris R; Ferrero F; Fracchia M; Gasperoni S; Malfitana G; Recchia S; Risio M; Rizzetto M; Saracco G; Spandre M; Turco D; Turco P; Zappa M;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 15741571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.