These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24679985)

  • 1. Vertical and horizontal polymerization shrinkage in composite restorations.
    Irie M; Tanaka J; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G
    Dent Mater; 2014 Jul; 30(7):e189-98. PubMed ID: 24679985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 11823011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 15451243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15209228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Schroeder M; Balducci I; Versluis A; Ballester RY
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of spherical silica additions on marginal gaps and compressive strength of experimental glass-ionomer cements.
    Irie M; Nagaoka N; Tamada Y; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Minagi S; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 22165460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal gap formation of light-activated base/liner materials: effect of setting shrinkage and bond strength.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Dent Mater; 1999 Nov; 15(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 10863439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flowable resin and marginal gap on tooth third medial cavity involving enamel and radicular cementum: a SEM evaluation of two restoration techniques.
    Lo Giudice G; Cicciù M; Cervino G; Lizio A; Visco AM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23649060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of Class I composite restorations when polished immediately or after one-day water storage.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183381. PubMed ID: 28817736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
    Nikolaenko SA; Lohbauer U; Roggendorf M; Petschelt A; Dasch W; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 15134946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shrinkage behaviors of dental composite restorations-The experimental-numerical hybrid analysis.
    Chuang SF; Huang PS; Chen TY; Huang LH; Su KC; Chang CH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Dec; 32(12):e362-e373. PubMed ID: 27671469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does single versus stepped curing of composite resins affect their shear bond strength?
    Caldwell R; Kulkarni G; Titley K
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2001 Nov; 67(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 11737983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.