99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24680120)
1. Characteristics and outcome of enhancing foci followed on breast MRI with management implications.
Ha R; Sung J; Lee C; Comstock C; Wynn R; Morris E
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jul; 69(7):715-20. PubMed ID: 24680120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Suspicious breast lesions detected at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: clinical and histological outcomes.
Johnson KS; Baker JA; Lee SS; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):667-74. PubMed ID: 22459645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 22528918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of the enhancing lesions on dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with interstitial mammoplasty.
Kim TY; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Cha ES; Kim JY; Song BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2205-11. PubMed ID: 24103354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two Distinct Types of Linear Distribution in Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MR Imaging: Difference in Positive Predictive Value between Linear and Branching Patterns.
Machida Y; Tozaki M; Shimauchi A; Yoshida T
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 25875971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters.
Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Matsushima S; Fukuda K
Radiat Med; 2005 Feb; 23(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15786751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.
Liberman L; Mason G; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):426-30. PubMed ID: 16423948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single focus on breast magnetic resonance imaging: diagnosis based on kinetic pattern and patient age.
Machida Y; Shimauchi A; Kuroki Y; Tozaki M; Kato Y; Hoshi K; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):652-659. PubMed ID: 27664278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluation.
Wang LC; DeMartini WB; Partridge SC; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):826-31. PubMed ID: 19696298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Lee MJ; Kaplan JB; LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Abramson AF; Dashnaw SM; Ballon DJ; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 12076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.
Friedlander LC; Roth SO; Gavenonis SC
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 21900618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The negative predictive value of breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in noncalcified BIRADS 3 lesions.
Dorrius MD; Pijnappel RM; Sijens PE; van der Weide MC; Oudkerk M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 21251784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invasive breast carcinoma: influence of prognosis and patient-related factors on kinetic MR imaging characteristics.
Millet I; Curros-Doyon F; Molinari N; Bouic-Pages E; Prat X; Alili C; Taourel P
Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 24029641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
Sakamoto N; Tozaki M; Higa K; Tsunoda Y; Ogawa T; Abe S; Ozaki S; Sakamoto M; Tsuruhara T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Yamashiro N; Fukuma E
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-risk breast lesions at imaging-guided needle biopsy: usefulness of MRI for treatment decision.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Linda A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W240-50. PubMed ID: 22826427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer detected on an incident (second or subsequent) round of screening MRI: MRI features of false-negative cases.
Yamaguchi K; Schacht D; Newstead GM; Bradbury AR; Verp MS; Olopade OI; Abe H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1155-63. PubMed ID: 24147491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
Teifke A; Lehr HA; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 12933456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions.
Eby PR; DeMartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Saini MH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 19696303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of residual disease using breast MRI after excisional biopsy for breast cancer.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Lee J; Cheung JY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1167-73. PubMed ID: 23617506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
