1196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24680364)
1. Is the modified natural in vitro fertilization cycle justified in patients with "genuine" poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Kedem A; Tsur A; Haas J; Yerushalmi GM; Hourvitz A; Machtinger R; Orvieto R
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1624-8. PubMed ID: 24680364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles.
Lin MH; Wu FS; Lee RK; Li SH; Lin SY; Hwu YM
Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1296-302. PubMed ID: 23993928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stop GnRH-Agonist Combined With Multiple-Dose GnRH-Antagonist Protocol for Patients With "Genuine" Poor Response Undergoing Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF.
Orvieto R; Kirshenbaum M; Galiano V; Elkan-Miller T; Zilberberg E; Haas J; Nahum R
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():182. PubMed ID: 32528403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.
Lainas TG; Sfontouris IA; Venetis CA; Lainas GT; Zorzovilis IZ; Tarlatzis BC; Kolibianakis EM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 26307091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 450 IU versus 600 IU gonadotropin for controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders: a randomized controlled trial.
Lefebvre J; Antaki R; Kadoch IJ; Dean NL; Sylvestre C; Bissonnette F; Benoit J; Ménard S; Lapensée L
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1419-25. PubMed ID: 26361207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the ovarian sensitivity index to define poor, normal, and high response after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol: suggestions for a new principle to solve an old problem.
Huber M; Hadziosmanovic N; Berglund L; Holte J
Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1270-6. PubMed ID: 23931964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimal stimulation protocol using letrozole versus microdose flare up GnRH agonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI.
Mohsen IA; El Din RE
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Feb; 29(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 23134528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Live-birth rates in very poor prognosis patients, who are defined as poor responders under the Bologna criteria, with nonelective single embryo, two-embryo, and three or more embryos transferred.
Gleicher N; Vega MV; Darmon SK; Weghofer A; Wu YG; Wang Q; Zhang L; Albertini DF; Barad DH; Kushnir VA
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1435-41. PubMed ID: 26348275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles.
Barrenetxea G; Agirregoikoa JA; Jiménez MR; de Larruzea AL; Ganzabal T; Carbonero K
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):546-53. PubMed ID: 17531989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Morgia F; Sbracia M; Schimberni M; Giallonardo A; Piscitelli C; Giannini P; Aragona C
Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1542-7. PubMed ID: 15193474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI].
Wu CX; Zhang T; Shu L; Huang J; Diao FY; Ding W; Gao Y; Wang W; Mao YD; Cui YG; Liu JY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 29609229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study.
Polyzos NP; Nelson SM; Stoop D; Nwoye M; Humaidan P; Anckaert E; Devroey P; Tournaye H
Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 23602319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria.
Polyzos NP; Blockeel C; Verpoest W; De Vos M; Stoop D; Vloeberghs V; Camus M; Devroey P; Tournaye H
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3481-6. PubMed ID: 22940767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro fertilization cycle outcome after coasting in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocols.
Farhi J; Ben-Haroush A; Lande Y; Sapir O; Pinkas H; Fisch B
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 18321490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for poor responders in in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programs.
Orvieto R; Kruchkovich J; Rabinson J; Zohav E; Anteby EY; Meltcer S
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 17681292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional IVF as a laboratory strategy to rescue fertility potential in severe poor responder patients: the impact of reproductive aging.
Artini PG; Obino ME; Carletti E; Pinelli S; Ruggiero M; Di Emidio G; Cela V; Tatone C
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Nov; 29(11):997-1001. PubMed ID: 23909592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
