1055 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24680467)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system.
Hoffmann MF; Burgers TA; Mason JJ; Williams BO; Sietsema DL; Jones CB
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1035-41. PubMed ID: 24680467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.
Lewis GS; Caroom CT; Wee H; Jurgensmeier D; Rothermel SD; Bramer MA; Reid JS
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Oct; 29(10):e364-70. PubMed ID: 26053467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation.
Zdero R; Walker R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 18451400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.
Dennis MG; Simon JA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; DiCesare PE
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 10884215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables.
Graham SM; Mak JH; Moazen M; Leonidou A; Jones AC; Wilcox RK; Tsiridis E
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Sep; 20(5):875-80. PubMed ID: 25968896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.
Chen DW; Lin CL; Hu CC; Wu JW; Lee MS
Injury; 2012 Jul; 43(7):1061-5. PubMed ID: 22336128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.
Fulkerson E; Koval K; Preston CF; Iesaka K; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16462560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Better Axial Stiffness of a Bicortical Screw Construct Compared to a Cable Construct for Comminuted Vancouver B1 Proximal Femoral Fractures.
Griffiths JT; Taheri A; Day RE; Yates PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2333-7. PubMed ID: 26239233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do Transcortical Screws in a Locking Plate Construct Improve the Stiffness in the Fixation of Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? A Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Different Plating Constructs.
Lochab J; Carrothers A; Wong E; McLachlin S; Aldebeyan W; Jenkinson R; Whyne C; Nousiainen MT
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Jan; 31(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28002219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Wilson D; Frei H; Masri BA; Oxland TR; Duncan CP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jan; 20(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15567539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angulated locking plate in periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: biomechanical testing of a new prototype plate.
Lenz M; Gueorguiev B; Joseph S; van der Pol B; Richards RG; Windolf M; Schwieger K; de Boer P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1437-44. PubMed ID: 22707211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic loading of periprosthetic fracture fixation constructs.
Talbot M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
J Trauma; 2008 May; 64(5):1308-12. PubMed ID: 18469655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model.
Roberts JW; Grindel SI; Rebholz B; Wang M
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):971-5. PubMed ID: 17826548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone.
Demos HA; Briones MS; White PH; Hogan KA; Barfield WR
J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):783-8. PubMed ID: 22014657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biomechanical study on proximal plate fixation techniques in periprosthetic femur fractures.
Lenz M; Perren SM; Gueorguiev B; Richards RG; Hofmann GO; Fernandez dell'Oca A; Höntzsch D; Windolf M
Injury; 2014 Jan; 45 Suppl 1():S71-5. PubMed ID: 24252576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of fixation technique on the stiffness of comminuted Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures.
Choi JK; Gardner TR; Yoon E; Morrison TA; Macaulay WB; Geller JA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):124-8. PubMed ID: 20558031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Buttaro MA; Farfalli G; Paredes Núñez M; Comba F; Piccaluga F
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1964-9. PubMed ID: 17768193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: A Biomechanical Analysis of Cerclage Fixation.
Frisch NB; Charters MA; Sikora-Klak J; Banglmaier RF; Oravec DJ; Silverton CD
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1449-57. PubMed ID: 25765131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both?
Shah S; Kim SY; Dubov A; Schemitsch EH; Bougherara H; Zdero R
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Sep; 225(9):845-56. PubMed ID: 22070022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
