These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24681832)

  • 1. Optical quality and vision with iris-coloring soft contact lenses.
    Ortiz C; Jiménez R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 May; 91(5):564-9. PubMed ID: 24681832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the pigment-free optical zone diameter of decorative tinted soft contact lenses on visual function.
    Jung JW; Kim SM; Han SH; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 100(5):633-7. PubMed ID: 26377415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cosmetically tinted soft contact lenses on higher-order wavefront aberrations and visual performance.
    Hiraoka T; Ishii Y; Okamoto F; Oshika T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Feb; 247(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18953556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optical quality and visual performance with customised soft contact lenses for keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Tromans C; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Sep; 34(5):528-39. PubMed ID: 24758229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual performance and optical quality with soft lenses in keratoconus patients.
    Jinabhai A; Radhakrishnan H; Tromans C; O'Donnell C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):100-16. PubMed ID: 22268571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthetic soft contact lenses in Japan.
    Kanemoto M; Toshida H; Takahiro I; Murakami A
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):300-3. PubMed ID: 17993825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of special-effect contact lenses (Crazy Lenses) on visual function.
    Spraul CW; Roth HJ; Gäckle H; Lang GE; Lang GK
    CLAO J; 1998 Jan; 24(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 9474450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusion properties of prosthetic contact lenses for the treatment of amblyopia.
    Collins RS; McChesney ME; McCluer CA; Schatz MP
    J AAPOS; 2008 Dec; 12(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 18595755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of visual performance and image quality between a myopia-control contact lens and a single-vision contact lens.
    Han D; Zhang Z; Li B; Rong H; Song D; Du B; Wei R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2023 Oct; 46(5):101891. PubMed ID: 37574330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient.
    Marsack JD; Parker KE; Niu Y; Pesudovs K; Applegate RA
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 23(9):960-4. PubMed ID: 18041254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diurnal variations in visual performance for disposable contact lenses.
    Belda-Salmerón L; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; Madrid-Costa D; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):682-90. PubMed ID: 23770656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes.
    Fedtke C; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Chung J; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Feb; 39(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26228543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On-eye evaluation of optical performance of rigid and soft contact lenses.
    Hong X; Himebaugh N; Thibos LN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Dec; 78(12):872-80. PubMed ID: 11780664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-eye visual function comparison with and without a central hole contact lens-based system: potential applications to ICL design.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Belda-Salmerón L; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 29(10):702-7. PubMed ID: 24094310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of optical performance of soft contact lenses in myopic correction].
    Dalcoll MW; Alves MR; Barreto J; Yamane Ide S; Bechara S; Mukai A
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(6 Suppl):37-41. PubMed ID: 19274409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of contrast sensitivity in different soft contact lenses and spectacles.
    Wachler BS; Phillips CL; Schanzlin DJ; Krueger RR
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 10073637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.
    Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.