These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24681862)
1. Calcium score: semiautomatic calculation using different vendors versus fully automatic software. Brook OR; Abadi S; Shreiber R; Engel A; Mendiratta-Lala M; Brook A; Sheiman RG J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(3):434-8. PubMed ID: 24681862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts. Matsuura N; Horiguchi J; Yamamoto H; Hirai N; Tonda T; Kohno N; Ito K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1561-8. PubMed ID: 18492907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vessel specific coronary artery calcium scoring: an automatic system. Shahzad R; van Walsum T; Schaap M; Rossi A; Klein S; Weustink AC; de Feyter PJ; van Vliet LJ; Niessen WJ Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22981481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation dose reduction at coronary artery calcium scoring by using a low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction. Matsuura N; Urashima M; Fukumoto W; Sunamori H; Tatsugami F; Toyota N; Awai K J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 25319604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between coronary artery disease and epicardial adipose tissue quantification at cardiac CT: comparison between automatic volumetric measurement and manual bidimensional estimation. Bastarrika G; Broncano J; Schoepf UJ; Schwarz F; Lee YS; Abro JA; Costello P; Zwerner PL Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 20363161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness best R-R reconstruction interval determination software for the evaluation of dual-source coronary CT angiography examinations. Erol B; Karcaaltincaba M; Cay N; Hazirolan T; Aytemir K; Akata D J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 21412095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of isotropic calcium using 0.5-mm reconstructions from 320-row CT data sets identifies more patients with non-zero Agatston score and more subclinical atherosclerosis than standard 3.0-mm coronary artery calcium scan and CT angiography. Aslam A; Khokhar US; Chaudhry A; Abramowicz A; Rajper N; Cortegiano M; Poon M; Voros S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24582044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring on virtual unenhanced images derived from single-source fast kVp-switching dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Okamura T; Yamada M; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 25301045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction. Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation. Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT. Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model-based automatic segmentation algorithm accurately assesses the whole cardiac volumetric parameters in patients with cardiac CT angiography: a validation study for evaluating the accuracy of the workstation software and establishing the reference values. Mao SS; Li D; Vembar M; Gao Y; Luo Y; Lam F; Syed YS; Liu C; Woo K; Flores F; Budoff MJ Acad Radiol; 2014 May; 21(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 24703477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-scan variability of coronary artery calcium scoring assessed on 64-multidetector computed tomography vs. dual-source computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison. Ghadri JR; Goetti R; Fiechter M; Pazhenkottil AP; Küest SM; Nkoulou RN; Windler C; Buechel RR; Herzog BA; Gaemperli O; Templin C; Kaufmann PA Eur Heart J; 2011 Aug; 32(15):1865-74. PubMed ID: 21546450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcium score of small coronary calcifications on multidetector computed tomography: results from a static phantom study. Groen JM; Kofoed KF; Zacho M; Vliegenthart R; Willems TP; Greuter MJ Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):e58-63. PubMed ID: 23092538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of coronary calcifications from computed tomography scans for automated risk assessment of coronary artery disease. Isgum I; Rutten A; Prokop M; van Ginneken B Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1450-61. PubMed ID: 17500476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practical tips and tricks in cardiovascular computed tomography: non-contrast "heartscans"--beyond the calcium score. Rumberger JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 19201377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]