BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24682648)

  • 1. Routine contrast esophagram has minimal impact on the postoperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Cools-Lartigue J; Andalib A; Abo-Alsaud A; Gowing S; Nguyen M; Mulder D; Ferri L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):2573-9. PubMed ID: 24682648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the routine use of contrast radiography as a screening test for cervical anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy.
    Solomon DG; Sasaki CT; Salem RR
    Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 21906717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Diagnostic Value of Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.
    Hu Z; Wang X; An X; Li W; Feng Y; You Z
    World J Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(8):2062-2067. PubMed ID: 28255626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Air Bubble Sign: A New Screening Method for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Shoji Y; Takeuchi H; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 29318416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Typical Time Point of Occurrence, Mode of Diagnosis, Value of Routine Radiocontrast Agent Studies and Therapeutic Options.
    Struecker B; Andreou A; Chopra S; Heilmann AC; Spenke J; Denecke C; Sauer IM; Bahra M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Dig Surg; 2018; 35(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 29131024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Routine Radiologic Assessment for Anastomotic Leak Is Not Necessary in Asymptomatic Patients After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
    Kang H; Ben-David K; Sarosi GA; Thomas RM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Feb; 26(2):279-285. PubMed ID: 35037179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between esophagography and chest computed tomography for evaluation of leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-through.
    Lantos JE; Levine MS; Rubesin SE; Lau CT; Torigian DA
    J Thorac Imaging; 2013 Mar; 28(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23059739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Serial Drain Amylase Can Accurately Detect Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy and May Facilitate Early Discharge.
    Perry Y; Towe CW; Kwong J; Ho VP; Linden PA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Dec; 100(6):2041-6; discussion 2046-7. PubMed ID: 26319485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrathin endoscopy versus computed tomography in the detection of anastomotic leak in the early period after esophagectomy.
    Song P; Li J; Zhang Q; Gao S
    Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 32():30-34. PubMed ID: 31715559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosing conduit leak after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by computed tomography leak protocol and standard esophagram: Is old school still the best?
    Palacio D; Marom EM; Correa A; Betancourt-Cuellar SL; Hofstetter WL
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():23-29. PubMed ID: 29414520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Half of Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy Are Undetected on Initial Postoperative Esophagram.
    Elliott IA; Berry MF; Trope W; Lui NS; Guenthart BA; Liou DZ; Whyte RI; Backhus LM; Shrager JB
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):719-724. PubMed ID: 35618049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical value of routine contrast esophagram in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage for three-incision esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis].
    Duan XF; He LH; Shang XB; Yue J; Ma Z; Chen CG; Zhang C; Qu DW; Jiang HJ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 60(5):461-465. PubMed ID: 35359088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-enhanced swallow study sensitivity for anastomotic leak detection in post-esophagectomy patients.
    Mejía-Rivera S; Pérez-Marroquín SA; Cortés-González R; Medina-Franco H
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed); 2018; 83(4):400-404. PubMed ID: 29525701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of screening aqueous contrast swallow in detecting clinically significant anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy.
    Tirnaksiz MB; Deschamps C; Allen MS; Johnson DC; Pairolero PC
    Eur Surg Res; 2005; 37(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 15905619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography versus water-soluble contrast swallow in the detection of intrathoracic anastomotic leak complicating esophagogastrectomy (Ivor Lewis): a prospective study in 97 patients.
    Strauss C; Mal F; Perniceni T; Bouzar N; Lenoir S; Gayet B; Palau R
    Ann Surg; 2010 Apr; 251(4):647-51. PubMed ID: 19864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Routine Esophagram for Detecting Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy.
    Haisley KR; DeSouza ML; Dewey EN; Drexel SE; Vigneswaran Y; Hunter JG; Dolan JP
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Sep; 154(9):879-881. PubMed ID: 31314097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision analysis supports the use of drain amylase-based enhanced recovery method after esophagectomy.
    Jiang B; Ho VP; Ginsberg J; Fu SJ; Perry Y; Argote-Greene L; Linden PA; Towe CW
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29757360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy: Methodological Issues on Diagnostic Value.
    Sabour S
    World J Surg; 2017 Nov; 41(11):2973-2974. PubMed ID: 28397093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy; Methodological Issues on Diagnostic Value: Reply.
    You Z
    World J Surg; 2017 Nov; 41(11):2975. PubMed ID: 28492997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routine or on demand radiological contrast examination in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.
    Honing J; Pultrum BB; van der Jagt EJ; Groen H; Plukker JT
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 100(8):699-702. PubMed ID: 19731246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.