These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24682656)

  • 1. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery in the determination of adequate surgical margins.
    Eggemann H; Ignatov T; Costa SD; Ignatov A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 May; 145(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 24682656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer.
    Eggemann H; Ignatov T; Beni A; Costa SD; Ignatov A
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 24169374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound-Guided Versus Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery for Nonpalpable Breast Cancer.
    Eggemann H; Costa SD; Ignatov A
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Feb; 16(1):e1-6. PubMed ID: 26439275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of an intraoperative ultrasonography-guided localization and tissue fixation device demonstrates less margin positivity during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer than standard preoperative needle-wire localization: a retrospective comparative analysis in a consecutively treated case series.
    Povoski SP; Jimenez RE; Wang WP
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 24176781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.
    Leong C; Boyages J; Jayasinghe UW; Bilous M; Ung O; Chua B; Salisbury E; Wong AY
    Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1823-32. PubMed ID: 15112262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
    Wood WC
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
    Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Krekel NM; Haloua MH; Lopes Cardozo AM; de Wit RH; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; Muller S; van der Veen H; Bergers E; de Lange de Klerk ES; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jan; 14(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 23218662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
    Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical specimen ultrasound: is it able to predict the status of resection margins after breast-conserving surgery?
    Londero V; Zuiani C; Panozzo M; Linda A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
    Breast; 2010 Dec; 19(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 20609586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery.
    Shin HC; Han W; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Park SJ; Noh DY
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22692386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of resection margins and cosmetic outcome following intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision versus conventional palpation-guided breast conservation surgery in breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
    Vispute T; ; Seenu V; Parshad R; Hari S; Thulkar S; Mathur S
    Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 30829271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of the resection margin and risk factors for close or positive resection margin in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Gatek J; Vrana D; Melichar B; Vazan P; Kotocova K; Kotoc J; Dudesek B; Hnatek L; Duben J
    J BUON; 2012; 17(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 23033280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors that influence the incidence of microscopic carcinoma in frozen and preserved specimens from patients with breast carcinoma after breast-conserving surgery.
    Kim R; Osaki A; Kaneko M; Inai K; Toge T
    Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12883701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision.
    Krekel NM; Zonderhuis BM; Stockmann HB; Schreurs WH; van der Veen H; de Lange de Klerk ES; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21194880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
    Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
    Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do screen-detected breast cancers have positive margins less often than clinically detected breast cancers?
    de Munck L; Siesling S; Bart J; Menke-Pluijmers MB; Otter R; Willemse PH
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2013 Sep; 22(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 23492953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.