These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24682656)
21. Intra-operative ultrasound versus wire-guided localization in the surgical management of non-palpable breast cancer. Morris OJ; Knight V; Logan D Breast Dis; 2014 Jan; 34(4):157-63. PubMed ID: 24898200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimising surgical accuracy in palpable breast cancer with intra-operative breast ultrasound--feasibility and surgeons' learning curve. Krekel NM; Lopes Cardozo AM; Muller S; Bergers E; Meijer S; van den Tol MP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1044-50. PubMed ID: 21924854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Subsets of women with close or positive margins after breast-conserving surgery with high local recurrence risk despite breast plus boost radiotherapy. Lupe K; Truong PT; Alexander C; Lesperance M; Speers C; Tyldesley S Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov; 81(4):e561-8. PubMed ID: 21514069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience. Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Lovrics PJ; Cornacchi SD; Farrokhyar F; Garnett A; Chen V; Franic S; Simunovic M Am J Surg; 2009 Jun; 197(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 18789424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Learning curves in intraoperative ultrasound guided surgery in breast cancer based on complete breast cancer excision and no need for second surgeries. Esgueva A; Rodríguez-Revuelto R; Espinosa-Bravo M; Salazar JP; Rubio IT Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):578-583. PubMed ID: 30737056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Obedian E; Haffty BG Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery. Atalay C; Irkkan C Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CIH-Tokyo experience with breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy: 6.5 year follow-up results of 1462 patients. Kasumi F; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Iijima K; Miyagi U; Tada K; Makita M; Iwase T; Oguchi M; Yamashita T; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G Breast J; 2006; 12(5 Suppl 2):S181-90. PubMed ID: 16958999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative study of perioperative techniques to attain negative margins and spare healthy breast tissue in breast conserving surgery. Krishna KL; Srinath BS; Santosh D; Velusamy S; Divyamala KP; Sariya Mohammadi J; Kurpad V; Kulkarni S; Yaji P; Goud S; Dhanireddy S; Ram J Breast Dis; 2020; 39(3-4):127-135. PubMed ID: 32831188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of specimen US for predicting resection margin status in breast conserving therapy. Moschetta M; Telegrafo M; Introna T; Coi L; Rella L; Ranieri V; Cirili A; Stabile Ianora AA; Angelelli G G Chir; 2015; 36(5):201-4. PubMed ID: 26712255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The surgical margin status after breast-conserving surgery: discussion of an open issue. Luini A; Rososchansky J; Gatti G; Zurrida S; Caldarella P; Viale G; Rosali dos Santos G; Frasson A Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jan; 113(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 18386174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasonography- and/or mammography-guided breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: experience with 87 lesions. Hayashi N; Tsunoda H; Abe E; Kikuchi M; Enokido K; Tsugawa K; Suzuki K; Nakamura S Breast Cancer; 2012 Apr; 19(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20725871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Dillon MF; Hill AD; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 16474911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors associated with residual disease after initial breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. Wei S; Kragel CP; Zhang K; Hameed O Hum Pathol; 2012 Jul; 43(7):986-93. PubMed ID: 22221704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma. Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]