152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24682722)
1. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an awareness campaign for colorectal cancer: a mathematical modeling study.
Whyte S; Harnan S
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Jun; 25(6):647-58. PubMed ID: 24682722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.
Dinh TA; Alperin P; Walter LC; Smith R
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 22237663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Murray A; Lourenco T; de Verteuil R; Hernandez R; Fraser C; McKinley A; Krukowski Z; Vale L; Grant A
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 10(45):1-141, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17083853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer.
Pil L; Fobelets M; Putman K; Trybou J; Annemans L
Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 32():72-8. PubMed ID: 27157827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Mohan G; Chattopadhyay S
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 32556187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy in Iranian High Risk Population.
Javadinasab H; Daroudi R; Salimzadeh H; Delavari A; Vezvaie P; Malekzadeh R
Arch Iran Med; 2017 Sep; 20(9):564-571. PubMed ID: 29048918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a mass-media campaign for improving participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
Worthington J; Feletto E; Lew JB; Broun K; Durkin S; Wakefield M; Grogan P; Harper T; Canfell K
Public Health; 2020 Feb; 179():90-99. PubMed ID: 31760206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of assumptions on future costs, disutility and mortality in cost-effectiveness analysis; a model exploration.
Omidvari AH; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; de Koning HJ; Meester RGS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253893. PubMed ID: 34252090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modelling cost-effective strategies for minimising socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening outcomes in England.
Thomas C; Mandrik O; Whyte S
Prev Med; 2022 Sep; 162():107131. PubMed ID: 35803353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Change in public awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms following the Be Cancer Alert Campaign in the multi-ethnic population of Malaysia.
Schliemann D; Paramasivam D; Dahlui M; Cardwell CR; Somasundaram S; Ibrahim Tamin NSB; Donnelly C; Su TT; Donnelly M
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):252. PubMed ID: 32213173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
