397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24683562)
1. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom metal-composite resin premolar implant abutments.
Boff LL; Oderich E; Cardoso AC; Magne P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):364-73. PubMed ID: 24683562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments.
Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Magne P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1360-8. PubMed ID: 22117899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments.
Magne P; Paranhos MP; Burnett LH; Magne M; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 21044162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations.
Magne P; Silva M; Oderich E; Boff LL; Enciso R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 22092518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
Rosentritt M; Rembs A; Behr M; Hahnel S; Preis V
J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars.
Magne P; Knezevic A
Quintessence Int; 2009 Feb; 40(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 19169444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns.
Rosentritt M; Hahnel S; Engelhardt F; Behr M; Preis V
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 27370027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
