These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24683563)

  • 1. Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates.
    Park JM; Yi TK; Koak JY; Kim SK; Park EJ; Heo SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 24683563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a milled digital implant surgical guide: An in vitro study.
    Liu X; Liu J; Feng H; Pan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):453-461. PubMed ID: 33309294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
    Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
    Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
    Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology.
    Shen P; Zhao J; Fan L; Qiu H; Xu W; Wang Y; Zhang S; Kim YJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2189-94. PubMed ID: 26776292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the fabrication deviation of a kind of milling digital implant surgical guides].
    Chai JY; Liu JZ; Wang B; Qu J; Sun Z; Gao WH; Guo TH; Feng HL; Pan SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):892-898. PubMed ID: 30337754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
    Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a Template-Guided Implant Surgery System with a CAD/CAM-Based Measurement Method: An In Vitro Study.
    Brandt J; Brenner M; Lauer HC; Brandt S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29534120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Knierim K; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 21443593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Implant Placement Guided with Surgical Template: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.
    Zhou M; Zhou H; Li SY; Yang XB; Geng YM; Che YJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2021; 41(2):e55-e62. PubMed ID: 33819327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Surgical Template on the Accuracy of Implant Placement.
    Xu LW; You J; Zhang JX; Liu YF; Peng W
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):641-646. PubMed ID: 26619380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and accuracy of skin-supported surgical templates for computer-planned craniofacial implant placement, a comparison between surgical templates: With and without bony fixation.
    Dings JPJ; Verhamme L; Maal TJJ; Merkx MAW; Meijer GJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 47(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 30905534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method.
    Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1530-5. PubMed ID: 24954760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.
    Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.
    Stumpel LJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.