These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24683889)
1. [The neutrality of the medical expert]. Schröter F Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Mar; 66(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24683889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass. Johnston JC; Sartwelle TP J Child Neurol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):484-501. PubMed ID: 23504251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Medical malpractice in surgery I: Suspected malpractice and patterns of risks]. Hansis ML Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Apr; 128(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 12700996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The required scope of nursing documentation from the legal liability perspective]. Bachem J; Börner K; Frings P; Jorzig A; Kamm J; Philipp A; Plantholz M; Udsching P; Weiss T Kinderkrankenschwester; 2014 Jun; 33(6):235-7. PubMed ID: 25055449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The medical expert witness: legal and ethical issues. Hirsch P Clin Dermatol; 2010 Mar; 28(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 20347668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Discussing errors with patients. Don't prime the malpractice trap!]. Thomas A MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Dec; 146(49):53-4. PubMed ID: 15646720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Communication - a treatment error? The proper behavior "afterward"]. Erhard D Aktuelle Urol; 2013 May; 44(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 23712273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Shortcomings of reports of forensic medicine experts with regard to the professional malpractice of medical workers]. Panov IE; Faĭn MA; Isaev AI Sud Med Ekspert; 1985; 28(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 3983994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses. Gutheil TG; Hauser M; White MS; Spruiell G; Strasburger LH J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 14974796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The whole truth versus the admissible truth. Gutheil TG; Hauser M; Spruiell G; White MS; Strasburger LH J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):340. PubMed ID: 15515925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. RETIRED: Providing opinion for medico-legal cases. Owolabi T; Farinei D; Bell D; Davis D; Knickle DA; Milne K; Senikas V; Wiens H J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Jul; 24(7):590-5. PubMed ID: 12196852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tobacco documents reveal questionable professional recertification by industry menthol expert. Stevens D; Glantz S Tob Control; 2016 May; 25(3):364. PubMed ID: 25967941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The geographical restrictions on expert testimony in medical malpractice cases in Virginia. Med Leg Bull; 1985; 34(5):1-10. PubMed ID: 4069071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Expert testimony in malpractice from the physician's viewpoint]. Vorster CF Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):584-9; discussion 589-94. PubMed ID: 8588428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expert witnesses: perpetuating a flawed system and ethical issues related to medical expert testimony. Patsner B Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):739; author reply 739. PubMed ID: 16507950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [From the expert's office: The operation report and expert opinion]. Schneider G; Brusis T; Michel O Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Jan; 90(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21225532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]