These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24684258)

  • 1. Which way is which? Examining global/local processing with symbolic cues.
    Mills M; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1429-36. PubMed ID: 24684258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which way is which? Examining symbolic control of attention with compound arrow cues.
    Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2152-63. PubMed ID: 27250360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring effects of voluntary attention: a comparison among predictive arrow, colour, and number cues.
    Olk B; Tsankova E; Petca AR; Wilhelm AF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2025-41. PubMed ID: 24697668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orienting of attention with eye and arrow cues and the effect of overtraining.
    Guzzon D; Brignani D; Miniussi C; Marzi CA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 20421095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The functional role of alternation advantage in the sequence effect of symbolic cueing with nonpredictive arrow cues.
    Qian Q; Song M; Shinomori K; Wang F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1430-6. PubMed ID: 22718205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.
    Crawford TJ; Muller HJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
    Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visuospatial attention is guided by both the symbolic value and the spatial proximity of selected arrows.
    Pratt J; Radulescu P; Guo RM; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1321-4. PubMed ID: 20873941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence effects of the involuntary and the voluntary components of symbolic cueing.
    Qian Q; Wang F; Song M; Feng Y; Shinomori K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):662-668. PubMed ID: 29280048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
    Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal course of position shift for a peripheral target.
    Yamada Y; Miura K; Kawabe T
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21562033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of the nature of attentional deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease: evidence from a spatial orienting task.
    Filoteo JV; Delis DC; Salmon DP; Demadura T; Roman MJ; Shults CW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Jul; 3(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9260443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.