308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24684498)
1. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
Thomas MD; Williams CC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.
Schmidt J; Zelinsky GJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1904-14. PubMed ID: 19459137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of viewing time, fixations, and viewing strategies on visual memory for briefly presented natural objects.
Huebner GM; Gegenfurtner KR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1398-413. PubMed ID: 20043271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
Foulsham T; Underwood G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal and preferred eye landing positions in objects and scenes.
Foulsham T; Kingstone A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1707-28. PubMed ID: 23398283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
Schubö A; Müller HJ
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
Berry JH
Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
Poole BJ; Kane MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search.
Soto D; Humphreys GW; Heinke D
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 16529778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of memory for visual search in scenes.
Le-Hoa Võ M; Wolfe JM
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25684693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual search in the real world: evidence for the formation of distractor representations.
Howard CJ; Pharaon RG; Körner C; Smith AD; Gilchrist ID
Perception; 2011; 40(10):1143-53. PubMed ID: 22308885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
