388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24684511)
1. Factors influencing disease progression of prostate cancer under active surveillance: a McGill University Health Center cohort.
Barayan GA; Brimo F; Bégin LR; Hanley JA; Liu Z; Kassouf W; Aprikian AG; Tanguay S
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E99-E104. PubMed ID: 24684511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate-specific antigen cancer volume: a significant prognostic factor in prostate cancer patients at intermediate risk of failing radiotherapy.
Lankford SP; Pollack A; Zagars GK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 May; 38(2):327-33. PubMed ID: 9226319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single small focus of prostate adenocarcinoma (< or = 1 mm and too small for grading) and clinical significant disease after radical prostatectomy.
Taverna G; Colombo P; Seveso M; Giusti G; Piccinelli A; Benetti A; Graziotti P
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2006 Jun; 78(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 16929604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort.
Dall'Era MA; Konety BR; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Stauf F; Cooperberg MR; Meng MV; Kane CJ; Perez N; Master VA; Carroll PR
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(12):2664-70. PubMed ID: 18433013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).
El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22726582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nine-year Follow-up for a Study of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Prospective Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
Henderson DR; de Souza NM; Thomas K; Riches SF; Morgan VA; Sohaib SA; Dearnaley DP; Parker CC; van As NJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1028-33. PubMed ID: 26482887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Predicts Gleason Score Upgrade in an Active Surveillance Cohort.
Washington SL; Baskin AS; Ameli N; Nguyen HG; Westphalen AC; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):574-578. PubMed ID: 31913068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in Gleason score grading on serial follow-up biopsies in prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance.
Guijarro A; Hernández V; López B; Capitán C; Pérez-Fernández E; de la Peña E; de la Morena JM; Llorente C
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Apr; 39(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 25305107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of repeated biopsy of the prostate in predicting disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Al Otaibi M; Ross P; Fahmy N; Jeyaganth S; Trottier H; Sircar K; Bégin LR; Souhami L; Kassouf W; Aprikian A; Tanguay S
Cancer; 2008 Jul; 113(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 18484590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience.
Soloway MS; Soloway CT; Williams S; Ayyathurai R; Kava B; Manoharan M
BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17850361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
