These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24684680)

  • 1. Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet.
    Barisch-Fritz B; Schmeltzpfenning T; Plank C; Grau S
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 24684680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new approach to children's footwear based on foot type classification.
    Mauch M; Grau S; Krauss I; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
    Ergonomics; 2009 Aug; 52(8):999-1008. PubMed ID: 19629814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D laser measurements of bare and shod feet during walking.
    Novak B; Možina J; Jezeršek M
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24661899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1-13 years: a cross-sectional study.
    Müller S; Carlsohn A; Müller J; Baur H; Mayer F
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 22118730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foot flare and foot axis.
    Goonetilleke RS; Luximon A
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):596-607. PubMed ID: 10774130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: a proof of concept study.
    Stanković K; Booth BG; Danckaers F; Burg F; Vermaelen P; Duerinck S; Sijbers J; Huysmans T
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():8. PubMed ID: 29541162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot motion in children shoes: a comparison of barefoot walking with shod walking in conventional and flexible shoes.
    Wolf S; Simon J; Patikas D; Schuster W; Armbrust P; Döderlein L
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17353125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex-related differences in foot shape.
    Krauss I; Grau S; Mauch M; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1693-709. PubMed ID: 18941975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foot deformation analysis with different load-bearing conditions to enhance diabetic footwear designs.
    Zhang L; Yick KL; Li PL; Yip J; Ng SP
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0264233. PubMed ID: 35320281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in dynamic plantar pressure during loaded gait.
    Goffar SL; Reber RJ; Christiansen BC; Miller RB; Naylor JA; Rodriguez BM; Walker MJ; Teyhen DS
    Phys Ther; 2013 Sep; 93(9):1175-84. PubMed ID: 23580629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. COMPARING 3D FOOT SHAPE MODELS BETWEEN TAIWANESE AND JAPANESE FEMALES.
    Lee YC; Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Wang MJ
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2015 Jun; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27281917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling foot height and foot shape-related dimensions.
    Xiong S; Goonetilleke RS; Witana CP; Lee Au EY
    Ergonomics; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1272-89. PubMed ID: 18608473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
    Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of female foot morphology and last design in athletic footwear--are men's lasts appropriate for women?
    Krauss I; Valiant G; Horstmann T; Grau S
    Res Sports Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 20397116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preliminary normative values for foot loading parameters of the developing child.
    Bosch K; Gerss J; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 17110112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit.
    Witana CP; Feng J; Goonetilleke RS
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(12):1301-17. PubMed ID: 15370849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An exploratory study of dynamic foot shape measurements with 4D scanning system.
    Zhang LY; Yick KL; Yue MJ; Yip J; Ng SP
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8628. PubMed ID: 37244970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foot landmarking for footwear customization.
    Luximon A; Goonetilleke RS; Tsui KL
    Ergonomics; 2003 Mar; 46(4):364-83. PubMed ID: 12637176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief.
    Owings TM; Woerner JL; Frampton JD; Cavanagh PR; Botek G
    Diabetes Care; 2008 May; 31(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 18252899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between arch height and foot length: Implications for size grading.
    Hill M; Naemi R; Branthwaite H; Chockalingam N
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):243-250. PubMed ID: 27890134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.