These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24685792)

  • 1. Flowable composite an alternative orthodontic bonding adhesive: an in vitro study.
    Kumar KS; Rao CH; Reddy KB; Chidambaram S; Girish H; Murgod S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):883-6. PubMed ID: 24685792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Park SB; Son WS; Ko CC; García-Godoy F; Park MG; Kim HI; Kwon YH
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 20019425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets to aged composite using a self-adhesive composite: Effect of surface conditioning and different bonding agents.
    Valizadeh S; Alimohammadi G; Nik TH; Etemadi A; Tanbakuchi B
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):528-537. PubMed ID: 32451267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of a flowable ormocer for bonding brackets.
    Vicente A; Bravo LA
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 17993024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial and fatigue bond strengths of nanofilled and conventional composite bonding adhesives.
    BenGassem AA; Georgiou G; Jones SP
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23794694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of adhesion promoters and curing-light sources on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Machado CT; Borges BC; Araujo GJ; dos Santos AJ; Dametto FR; Pinheiro FH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 23649057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength comparison of moisture-insensitive primers.
    Schaneveldt S; Foley TF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel shear bond strength of two orthodontic self-etching bonding systems compared to Transbond™ XT.
    Hellak A; Rusdea P; Schauseil M; Stein S; Korbmacher-Steiner HM
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):391-399. PubMed ID: 27582286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear bond strength of fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding and composite materials.
    Pseiner BC; Freudenthaler J; Jonke E; Bantleon HP
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 20080958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems.
    Abdelnaby YL; Al-Wakeel Eel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 20691363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical acceptability of two self-etch adhesive resins for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Schnebel B; Mateer S; Maganzini AL; Freeman K
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 23269689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of Ormocer as an alternative material for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Ajlouni R; Bishara SE; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Warren J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 15747824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Uysal T; Sari Z; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 15529507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer.
    Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Zárate-Díaz C; Kusakabe S; Yamamoto K
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 20575206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength.
    Montasser MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 21030470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel.
    Vaheed NA; Gupta M; David SA; Sam G; Ramanna PK; Bhagvandas SC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 30287702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.