These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24686722)

  • 1. Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Tarr E; Caldwell-Tarr A; Welling DB; Shahin AJ; Nittrouer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):566-82. PubMed ID: 24686722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weighting of Acoustic Cues to a Manner Distinction by Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Nittrouer S; Lowenstein JH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):1077-92. PubMed ID: 25813201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All cues are not created equal: the case for facilitating the acquisition of typical weighting strategies in children with hearing loss.
    Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):466-80. PubMed ID: 25611214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual weighting strategies of children with cochlear implants and normal hearing.
    Nittrouer S; Caldwell-Tarr A; Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 52():111-33. PubMed ID: 25307477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic Cue Weighting by Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Mismatch Negativity Study.
    Moberly AC; Bhat J; Shahin AJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 26655914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of spectral resolution on spectral contrast effects in cochlear-implant users.
    Feng L; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL468. PubMed ID: 29960500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
    Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.
    Fleming JT; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1300. PubMed ID: 36182279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplitude rise time does not cue the /ba/-/wa/ contrast for adults or children.
    Nittrouer S; Lowenstein JH; Tarr E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):427-40. PubMed ID: 22992704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of list equivalency for Mandarin speech materials to use with cochlear implant listeners.
    Li Y; Wang S; Su Q; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S31-S40. PubMed ID: 27414242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Feng L; Oxenham AJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):990-997. PubMed ID: 31815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.
    Peng SC; Lu N; Chatterjee M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.