These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24686722)

  • 21. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.
    Peng SC; Lu N; Chatterjee M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.
    DiNino M; Arenberg JG; Duchen ALR; Winn MB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2425-2440. PubMed ID: 32552327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.
    Won JH; Jones GL; Drennan WR; Jameyson EM; Rubinstein JT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2088-97. PubMed ID: 21973363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.
    Winn MB; Chatterjee M; Idsardi WJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1465-79. PubMed ID: 22352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.
    Gianakas SP; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3373. PubMed ID: 31795696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Hegarty L; Faulkner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Kang RS; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 20595901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.