These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24686855)

  • 41. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Working Memory and Speech Comprehension in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.
    Nagaraj NK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):2949-2964. PubMed ID: 29049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Seeing the Talker's Face Improves Free Recall of Speech for Young Adults With Normal Hearing but Not Older Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Rudner M; Mishra S; Stenfelt S; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 27280873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Nagaraj NK; Magimairaj BM; Schwartz S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3581-3593. PubMed ID: 32494910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Effect of Background Noise on Immediate Free Recall of Words in Younger and Older Listeners with Hearing Loss.
    Hwang JS; Jung Y; Lee JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):701-707. PubMed ID: 33588512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of minimal hearing loss on children's ability to multitask in quiet and in noise.
    McFadden B; Pittman A
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2008 Jul; 39(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 18596291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Auditory Lexical Decision and Repetition in Children: Effects of Acoustic and Lexical Constraints.
    Pittman AL; Rash MA
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e119-28. PubMed ID: 26465343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of auditory spatial awareness in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Cohen J; Cord M; Zion D; Kalluri S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1808-20. PubMed ID: 25324082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD.
    Michalek AM; Watson SM; Ash I; Ringleb S; Raymer A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24456181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cross-modal activation of auditory regions during visuo-spatial working memory in early deafness.
    Ding H; Qin W; Liang M; Ming D; Wan B; Li Q; Yu C
    Brain; 2015 Sep; 138(Pt 9):2750-65. PubMed ID: 26070981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relation between working memory capacity and auditory lateralization in children with auditory processing disorders.
    Moossavi A; Mehrkian S; Lotfi Y; Faghihzadeh S; sajedi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1981-6. PubMed ID: 25262275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.
    White-Schwoch T; Davies EC; Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():34-47. PubMed ID: 26113025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA; Daneman M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):593-608. PubMed ID: 7860836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Executive Function, Visual Attention and the Cocktail Party Problem in Musicians and Non-Musicians.
    Clayton KK; Swaminathan J; Yazdanbakhsh A; Zuk J; Patel AD; Kidd G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0157638. PubMed ID: 27384330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.