219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24686926)
1. Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.
Gray S; Pittman A; Weinhold J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1011-25. PubMed ID: 24686926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.
Gray S; Brinkley S; Svetina D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1289-300. PubMed ID: 22411280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast mapping and word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment in a supported learning context: effect of encoding cues, phonotactic probability, and object familiarity.
Gray S; Brinkley S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 20966382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Word recognition and nonword repetition in children with language disorders: the effects of neighborhood density, lexical frequency, and phonotactic probability.
Rispens J; Baker A; Duinmeijer I
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 25421294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of incremental changes in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children.
Storkel HL; Bontempo DE; Aschenbrenner AJ; Maekawa J; Lee SY
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1689-700. PubMed ID: 23882005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel-word learning deficits in Mandarin-speaking preschool children with specific language impairments.
Chen Y; Liu HM
Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jan; 35(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 24211792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding Bilingual Word Learning: The Role of Phonotactic Probability and Phonological Neighborhood Density.
Nair VK; Biedermann B; Nickels L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3551-3560. PubMed ID: 29114764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary.
Storkel HL; Hoover JR
J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):628-43. PubMed ID: 20609282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sensitivity of children with SLI to phonotactic probabilities during lexical access.
Quémart P; Maillart C
J Commun Disord; 2016; 61():48-59. PubMed ID: 27023739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: the case of phonotactic probability and nonword repetition.
McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1579-94. PubMed ID: 23926294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
MacRoy-Higgins M; Schwartz RG; Shafer VL; Marton K
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1224-48. PubMed ID: 24191951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
Storkel HL; Armbrüster J; Hogan TP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17197489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.
Storkel HL; Maekawa J
J Child Lang; 2005 Nov; 32(4):827-53. PubMed ID: 16429713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid naming by children with and without specific language impairment.
Coady JA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):604-17. PubMed ID: 22988287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
Storkel HL; Hoover JR
J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 20004908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Adults' Word Learning in Noisy Conditions.
Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Cox C
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):547-560. PubMed ID: 27788276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. I remembered the chorm! Word learning abilities of children with and without phonological impairment.
Hearnshaw S; Baker E; Pomper R; McGregor KK; Edwards J; Munro N
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024; 59(3):913-931. PubMed ID: 37902394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.
Coady JA; Mainela-Arnold E; Evans JL
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):144-59. PubMed ID: 23472955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
