These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24686926)

  • 21. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Dalton KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of onset and rhyme primes in preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.
    Gray S; Reiser M; Brinkley S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 22199187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.
    Munson B; Kurtz BA; Windsor J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1033-47. PubMed ID: 16411794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maternal input to children with specific language impairment during shared book reading: is mothers' language in tune with their children's production?
    Majorano M; Lavelli M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(2):204-14. PubMed ID: 24224893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position.
    Zamuner TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18723600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: effect of phonological or semantic cues.
    Gray S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 48(6):1452-67. PubMed ID: 16478383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonword repetition: the relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and reading impairment.
    Rispens J; Baker A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):683-94. PubMed ID: 22223893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beyond phonotactic frequency: presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.
    Plante E; Bahl M; Vance R; Gerken L
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 20727533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers.
    Messer MH; Leseman PP; Boom J; Mayo AY
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Apr; 105(4):306-23. PubMed ID: 20116805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 47(6):1454-68. PubMed ID: 15842022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors that influence fast mapping in children exposed to Spanish and English.
    Alt M; Meyers C; Figueroa C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1237-48. PubMed ID: 23816663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What can Neighbourhood Density effects tell us about word learning? Insights from a connectionist model of vocabulary development.
    Takac M; Knott A; Stokes S
    J Child Lang; 2017 Mar; 44(2):346-379. PubMed ID: 26884360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between phonological short-term memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in children with specific language impairment.
    Jackson E; Leitao S; Claessen M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Jan; 51(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 26132884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1321-37. PubMed ID: 11776368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical markers in Italian-speaking children with and without specific language impairment: a study of non-word and real word repetition as predictors of grammatical ability.
    Dispaldro M; Leonard LB; Deevy P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(5):554-64. PubMed ID: 24033653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Beyond capacity limitations II: effects of lexical processes on word recall in verbal working memory tasks in children with and without specific language impairment.
    Mainela-Arnold E; Evans JL; Coady J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1656-72. PubMed ID: 20705747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of word characteristics on the vocabulary of children with cochlear implants.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Yoshinaga-Itano C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2015 Jul; 20(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 25802320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lexical representations in children with SLI: evidence from a frequency-manipulated gating task.
    Mainela-Arnold E; Evans JL; Coady JA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):381-93. PubMed ID: 18367684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of input rate and age on the real-time language processing of children with specific language impairment.
    Montgomery JW
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):171-88. PubMed ID: 16101273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.