198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24687417)
1. Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.
Kim JC; Lim SB; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim CW; Kim CN
Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2734-44. PubMed ID: 24687417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Alotaibi AM; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Park IJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 28357501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Bong JW; Seo JH; Kim CW; Park SH; Kim J
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2082-2094. PubMed ID: 31332563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery.
Kuo LJ; Lin YK; Chang CC; Tai CJ; Chiou JF; Chang YJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 29(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 24562546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for rectal submucosal tumour.
Du JL; Chen CC; Chao HM; Kuo LJ
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):478-82. PubMed ID: 26010872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid abdominal robotic approach with conventional transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: feasibility and outcomes from a single institution.
Nikolic A; Waters PS; Peacock O; Choi CC; Rajkomar A; Heriot AG; Smart P; Warrier S
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):633-641. PubMed ID: 31625075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting.
Pai VD; De Souza A; Patil P; Engineer R; Arya S; Saklani A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25583650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases.
Chau A; Frasson M; Debove C; Maggiori L; Panis Y
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):701-5. PubMed ID: 27631305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
