These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24687445)
1. Palatal morphology can influence speaker-specific realizations of phonemic contrasts. Weirich M; Fuchs S J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1894-908. PubMed ID: 24687445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-speaker articulatory variability during vowel-consonant-vowel sequences in twins and unrelated speakers. Weirich M; Lancia L; Brunner J J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3766-80. PubMed ID: 24180787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior. Brunner J; Fuchs S; Perrier P J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3936-49. PubMed ID: 19507976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Articulatory and acoustic adaptation to palatal perturbation. Thibeault M; Ménard L; Baum SR; Richard G; McFarland DH J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2112-20. PubMed ID: 21476667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of auditory acuity on acoustic variability and the use of motor equivalence during adaptation to a perturbation. Brunner J; Ghosh S; Hoole P; Matthies M; Tiede M; Perkell J J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):727-39. PubMed ID: 20966388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interspeaker variability in hard palate morphology and vowel production. Lammert A; Proctor M; Narayanan S J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):S1924-33. PubMed ID: 24687447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-speaker variability in palatometric measures of consonant articulation. Dromey C; Sanders M J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(6):397-407. PubMed ID: 19482291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tongue/palate contact for the production of /s/ and /z/. McLeod S; Roberts A; Sita J Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16393798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech production in Parkinson's disease: I. An electropalatographic investigation of tongue-palate contact patterns. McAuliffe MJ; Ward EC; Murdoch BE Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16393795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using EPG data to display articulatory separation for phoneme contrasts. Gibbon FE; Lee A Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Nov; 25(11-12):1014-21. PubMed ID: 21967129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tongue palate contact patterns of velar stops in normal adult English speakers. Liker M; Gibbon FE Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Feb; 22(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 18253872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation. Patri JF; Ostry DJ; Diard J; Schwartz JL; Trudeau-Fisette P; Savariaux C; Perrier P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(11):6255-6263. PubMed ID: 32123070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the distinction between Norwegian [symbols: see text] from a phonetic perspective. Simonsen HG; Moen I Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(6-8):605-20. PubMed ID: 15573494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sibilant production in Hebrew-speaking adults: Apical versus laminal. Icht M; Ben-David BM Clin Linguist Phon; 2018; 32(3):193-212. PubMed ID: 28727493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The distinctness of speakers' /s/-/S/ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect. Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Tiede M; Lane H; Zandipour M; Marrone N; Stockmann E; Guenther FH J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 47(6):1259-69. PubMed ID: 15842009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to stretch and shrink vowel systems: results from a vowel normalization procedure. Geng C; Mooshammer C J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3278-88. PubMed ID: 19425670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]