190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24687746)
21. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADCmean) on primary cervical cancer is a predictive marker for disease recurrence.
Nakamura K; Joja I; Nagasaka T; Fukushima C; Kusumoto T; Seki N; Hongo A; Kodama J; Hiramatsu Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Dec; 127(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 22892362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for the Assessment of Cervical Cancer.
Guan Y; Shi H; Chen Y; Liu S; Li W; Jiang Z; Wang H; He J; Zhou Z; Ge Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 26720205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Erbay G; Guler OC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26919800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
Lee J; Kim CK; Park SY
MAGMA; 2020 Apr; 33(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 31549269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contribution of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and differentiation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Lin M; Yu X; Chen Y; Ouyang H; Wu B; Zheng D; Zhou C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2400-2410. PubMed ID: 27678132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.
Zhang Y; Chen J; Shen J; Zhong J; Ye R; Liang B
Clin Radiol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 22316593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Parameters of simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI predict tumor stage and several histopathological features in uterine cervical cancer.
Surov A; Meyer HJ; Schob S; Höhn AK; Bremicker K; Exner M; Stumpp P; Purz S
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(17):28285-28296. PubMed ID: 28423698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for differentiating primary CNS lymphomas from tumefactive demyelinating lesions.
Lu SS; Kim SJ; Kim N; Kim HS; Choi CG; Lim YM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 25794073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of Cervical Cancer with a Parameter-Free Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging Algorithm.
Becker AS; Perucho JA; Wurnig MC; Boss A; Ghafoor S; Khong PL; Lee EYP
Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(3):510-518. PubMed ID: 28458603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cervical cancer.
Xiao M; Ma X; Ma F; Li Y; Zhang G; Qiang J
Acta Radiol; 2022 Oct; 63(10):1415-1424. PubMed ID: 34382429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Value of pretherapeutic DWI in evaluating prognosis and therapeutic effect in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma given high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy: ADC-based assessment.
Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Wang XX; Deng XF; Zhu YZ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Oct; 71(10):1018-1029. PubMed ID: 27341986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3T in Endometrial Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient with Histopathological Prognostic Parameters.
Ozturk M; Kalkan C; Danaci M; Kefeli M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Dec; 31(12):1399-1405. PubMed ID: 34794277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pancreatic cancer: lack of association between apparent diffusion coefficient values and adverse pathological features.
Rosenkrantz AB; Matza BW; Sabach A; Hajdu CH; Hindman N
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):e191-7. PubMed ID: 23312674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The value of 3.0Tesla diffusion-weighted MRI for pelvic nodal staging in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Klerkx WM; Veldhuis WB; Spijkerboer AM; van den Bosch MA; Mali WP; Heintz AP; Bipat S; Sie-Go DM; van der Velden J; Schreuder HW; Stoker J; Peeters PH
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 48(18):3414-21. PubMed ID: 22835781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The prognostic significance of histologic type in early stage cervical cancer - A multi-institutional study.
Winer I; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Hassan O; Ahmed QF; Alosh B; Bandyopadhyay S; Thomas S; Albayrak S; Talukdar S; Al-Wahab Z; Elshaikh MA; Munkarah A; Morris R; Ali-Fehmi R
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 137(3):474-8. PubMed ID: 25677061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.
Caravan I; Ciortea CA; Contis A; Lebovici A
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 28835111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 3D analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient histograms in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grade.
Moriya T; Saito K; Tajima Y; Harada TL; Araki Y; Sugimoto K; Tokuuye K
Cancer Imaging; 2017 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 28057085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Correlations between the minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient values of hepatocellular carcinoma and tumor grade.
Li X; Zhang K; Shi Y; Wang F; Meng X
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1442-1447. PubMed ID: 27228086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient map of standard and high B-value diffusion MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a correlation study with histological grade.
Ahn SJ; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Han MH; Chang KH; Min HS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22818788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
