These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24687843)

  • 1. Constructing and validating readability models: the method of integrating multilevel linguistic features with machine learning.
    Sung YT; Chen JL; Cha JH; Tseng HC; Chang TH; Chang KE
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):340-54. PubMed ID: 24687843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
    Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CRIE: An automated analyzer for Chinese texts.
    Sung YT; Chang TH; Lin WC; Hsieh KS; Chang KE
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1238-1251. PubMed ID: 26424442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Health Material Accessibility: Development of Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Ji M; Liu Y; Hao T
    JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Sep; 9(9):e29175. PubMed ID: 34468321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension.
    Graesser AC; McNamara DS
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Apr; 3(2):371-98. PubMed ID: 25164300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language.
    Graesser AC; McNamara DS; Louwerse MM; Cai Z
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 15354684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating machine learning with linguistic features: A universal method for extraction and normalization of temporal expressions in Chinese texts.
    Wang S; Li R; Wu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107474. PubMed ID: 36931017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability of informed consent documents (1987-2007) for clinical trials: a linguistic analysis.
    Sand K; Eik-Nes NL; Loge JH
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Oct; 7(4):67-78. PubMed ID: 23086049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the Easiness and Complexity of English Health Materials for International Tertiary Students With Linguistically Enhanced Machine Learning Algorithms: Development and Validation Study.
    Xie W; Ji C; Hao T; Chow CY
    JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Oct; 9(10):e25110. PubMed ID: 34698644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing readability of consumer health information: an exploratory study.
    Gemoets D; Rosemblat G; Tse T; Logan R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):869-73. PubMed ID: 15360936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. LATIC-A linguistic analyzer for text and item characteristics.
    Cruz Neri N; Klückmann F; Retelsdorf J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277250. PubMed ID: 36327343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. English Text Readability Measurement Based on Convolutional Neural Network: A Hybrid Network Model.
    Jian L; Xiang H; Le G
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():6984586. PubMed ID: 35330607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A large-scaled corpus for assessing text readability.
    Crossley S; Heintz A; Choi JS; Batchelor J; Karimi M; Malatinszky A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):491-507. PubMed ID: 35297016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations.
    Wang LW; Miller MJ; Schmitt MR; Wen FK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 22835706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subtypes of written expression in elementary school children: a linguistic-based model.
    Wakely MB; Hooper SR; de Kruif RE; Swartz C
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 29(1):125-59. PubMed ID: 16390291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unraveling the linguistic nature of specific autobiographical memories using a computerized classification algorithm.
    Takano K; Ueno M; Moriya J; Mori M; Nishiguchi Y; Raes F
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):835-852. PubMed ID: 27338931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaching human language with complex networks.
    Cong J; Liu H
    Phys Life Rev; 2014 Dec; 11(4):598-618. PubMed ID: 24794524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using temporal cohesion to predict temporal coherence in narrative and expository texts.
    Duran ND; McCarthy PM; Graesser AC; McNamara DS
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17695347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Role of Surface, Semantic and Grammatical Features on Simplification of Spanish Medical Texts: A User Study.
    Mukherjee P; Leroy G; Kauchak D; Navarrete BA; Diaz DY; Colina S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1322-1331. PubMed ID: 29854201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.