These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24688565)

  • 1. Inflammatory response of canine gingiva to a chemical retraction agent placed at different time intervals.
    Ahmadzadeh A; Majd NE; Chasteen J; Kaviani A; Kavoosi MA
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jan; 11(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24688565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of different retraction medicaments on gingival tissue.
    Akca EA; Yildirim E; Dalkiz M; Yavuzyilmaz H; Beydemir B
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 16429704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs.
    Kopac I; Cvetko E; Marion L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11887594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Clinical Study of 50 Partially Edentulous Patients with Fixed Partial Denture Restorations to Compare Clinical Parameters and Changes in Gingival Sulcus Width After Displacement with 2 Different Gingival Retraction Cord Materials (Cotton and Polymer).
    Kumar L; Mattoo KA; Jain S; Khalid I; Kota MZ; Baig FAH; Ibrahim M; Javali MA; Khader MA; Kanji MA
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e940098. PubMed ID: 37183802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
    Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure.
    Igic M; Kostic M; Basic J; Krunic N; Pejcic A; Gligorijevic N; Milic Lemic A
    Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(5):492-498. PubMed ID: 32241014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Gingival Retraction Materials Using a New Gingival Sulcus Model.
    Dederichs M; Fahmy MD; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):784-789. PubMed ID: 31206914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
    Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gingival tissue inflammatory response following treatment with chemical retraction agents in Beagle dogs.
    Kopac I; Cvetko E; Pavlica Z; Marion L
    Pflugers Arch; 2001; 442(6 Suppl 1):R145-6. PubMed ID: 11678316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
    Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
    Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
    Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
    Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rabbit gingival tissue response to retraction liquids and tetrahydrozoline.
    Kostić I; Mihailović D; Najman S; Stojanović S; Kostić M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 24516990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
    Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Fluid Absorbency of Retraction Cords after Immersing in Two Retraction Medicaments - An In-vitro Study.
    Vishnubhotla G; Basapogu S; Karnati RK; Dasari PP; Thommandru MV; Bethu MB
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC19-ZC22. PubMed ID: 28050497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
    Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.