These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24688650)

  • 1. Computational Enzyme Design: Advances, hurdles and possible ways forward.
    Linder M
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2012; 2():e201209009. PubMed ID: 24688650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of Molecular Dynamics Based Predictions into the Optimization of De Novo Protein Designs: Limitations and Benefits.
    Carvalho HF; Barbosa AJ; Roque AC; Iranzo O; Branco RJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():181-201. PubMed ID: 27914051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational toxicology--a state of the science mini review.
    Kavlock RJ; Ankley G; Blancato J; Breen M; Conolly R; Dix D; Houck K; Hubal E; Judson R; Rabinowitz J; Richard A; Setzer RW; Shah I; Villeneuve D; Weber E
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 May; 103(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 18065772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational design gains momentum in enzyme catalysis engineering.
    Wijma HJ; Janssen DB
    FEBS J; 2013 Jul; 280(13):2948-60. PubMed ID: 23647554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational enzyme design approaches with significant biological outcomes: progress and challenges.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Song J
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2012; 2():e201209007. PubMed ID: 24688648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational enzyme design.
    Kiss G; Çelebi-Ölçüm N; Moretti R; Baker D; Houk KN
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2013 May; 52(22):5700-25. PubMed ID: 23526810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid schemes based on quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics simulations goals to success, problems, and perspectives.
    Ferrer S; Ruiz-Pernía J; Martí S; Moliner V; Tuñón I; Bertrán J; Andrés J
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2011; 85():81-142. PubMed ID: 21920322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conformational Features and Hydration Dynamics of Proteins in Cosolvents: A Perspective from Computational Approaches.
    Gazi R; Maity S; Jana M
    ACS Omega; 2023 Jan; 8(3):2832-2843. PubMed ID: 36713749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent developments in the computational study of protein structural and vibrational energy dynamics.
    Leitner DM; Yamato T
    Biophys Rev; 2020 Apr; 12(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 32124240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of Machine Learning and Coarse-Grained Molecular Simulations for Polymer Materials: Physical Understandings and Molecular Design.
    Nguyen D; Tao L; Li Y
    Front Chem; 2021; 9():820417. PubMed ID: 35141207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Curse and Blessing of Non-Proteinogenic Parts in Computational Enzyme Engineering.
    Korbeld KT; Fürst MJLJ
    Chembiochem; 2023 Jun; 24(12):e202300192. PubMed ID: 37150743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approaches to Computational Strain Design in the Multiomics Era.
    St John PC; Bomble YJ
    Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():597. PubMed ID: 31024467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Targeting protein-protein interactions with small molecules: challenges and perspectives for computational binding epitope detection and ligand finding.
    González-Ruiz D; Gohlke H
    Curr Med Chem; 2006; 13(22):2607-25. PubMed ID: 17017914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploiting enzyme evolution for computational protein design.
    Pinto GP; Corbella M; Demkiv AO; Kamerlin SCL
    Trends Biochem Sci; 2022 May; 47(5):375-389. PubMed ID: 34544655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overview, hurdles, and future work in adaptive designs: perspectives from a National Institutes of Health-funded workshop.
    Coffey CS; Levin B; Clark C; Timmerman C; Wittes J; Gilbert P; Harris S
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):671-80. PubMed ID: 23250942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational ligand design.
    Apostolakis J; Caflisch A
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 1999 Apr; 2(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 10420978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expanding Metabolic Capabilities Using Novel Pathway Designs: Computational Tools and Case Studies.
    Saa PA; Cortés MP; López J; Bustos D; Maass A; Agosin E
    Biotechnol J; 2019 Sep; 14(9):e1800734. PubMed ID: 31140756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies on Molecular Dynamics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Fuzzy Complexes: A Mini-Review.
    Kasahara K; Terazawa H; Takahashi T; Higo J
    Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2019; 17():712-720. PubMed ID: 31303975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.