232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24689093)
1. Transnasal endoscopy is preferred by transoral endoscopy experienced patients.
Kadayifci A; Atar M; Parlar S; Balkan A; Koruk I; Koruk M
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24689093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unsedated transnasal versus conventional oral endoscopy in endoscopy naïve patients.
Kadayifci A; Parlar S; Aydinli M; Dag MS; Demir U; Savas MC
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2014 Jun; 77(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 25090820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomised clinical study: comparison of acceptability, patient tolerance, cardiac stress and endoscopic views in transnasal and transoral endoscopy under local anaesthetic.
Alexandridis E; Inglis S; McAvoy NC; Falconer E; Graham C; Hayes PC; Plevris JN
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2014 Sep; 40(5):467-76. PubMed ID: 25039412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD
Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Catheter-free method is sufficient for preparation for transnasal endoscopy: randomized controlled trial.
Lee YS; Bang CS; Suk KT; Lee YH; Ham YL; Sung H; Ko JS; Kim WW; Kim JH; Kim HS; Park HJ; Kim MS
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 24283587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients.
Dumortier J; Napoleon B; Hedelius F; Pellissier PE; Leprince E; Pujol B; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 12556784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial experience of transnasal endoscopic biliary drainage without conscious sedation for the treatment of acute cholangitis (with video).
Itoi T; Kawai T; Itokawa F; Sofuni A; Kurihara T; Tsuchiya T; Ishii K; Tsuji S; Ikeuchi N; Takeuchi M; Sakai Y; Moriyasu F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Feb; 67(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 18226697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transnasal endoscopy: Technical considerations, advantages and limitations.
Atar M; Kadayifci A
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Feb; 6(2):41-8. PubMed ID: 24567791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transnasal endoscopy ease score "TNEase score" to evaluate patient tolerance of unsedated transnasal endoscopy.
Nguyen N; Pan Z; Smith C; Friedlander JA
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2024 Feb; 78(2):381-385. PubMed ID: 38374574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated endoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using 5.5-mm video endoscopy.
Watanabe H; Watanabe N; Ogura R; Nishino N; Saifuku Y; Hitomi G; Okamoto Y; Tominaga K; Yoshitake N; Yamagata M; Orui M; Hiraishi H
Dig Dis Sci; 2009 Oct; 54(10):2155-60. PubMed ID: 19082719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study comparing tolerability, satisfaction and acceptance of three different techniques for esophageal endoscopy: sedated conventional, unsedated peroral ultra thin, and esophageal capsule.
Nakos G; Karagiannis S; Ballas S; Galanis P; Alevizopoulos G; Nakos A; Mavrogiannis C
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 19191853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has favorable diagnostic effectiveness, cardiopulmonary safety, and patient satisfaction compared with conventional or sedated endoscopy.
Ai ZL; Lan CH; Fan LL; Lan L; Cao Y; Li P; Song O; Chen DF
Surg Endosc; 2012 Dec; 26(12):3565-72. PubMed ID: 22976847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.
Craig A; Hanlon J; Dent J; Schoeman M
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):292-6. PubMed ID: 10049410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.
Zaman A; Hahn M; Hapke R; Knigge K; Fennerty MB; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):279-84. PubMed ID: 10049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
