These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24689132)

  • 1. Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization.
    Forsythe M; Zellner D; Cogan E; Parker S
    Perception; 2014; 43(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 24689132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beauty beyond compare: effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast.
    Cogan E; Parker S; Zellner DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23244047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference.
    Zellner DA; Mattingly MC; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 19633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm.
    Zhang Y; Kong F; Chen H; Jackson T; Han L; Meng J; Yang Z; Gao J; Najam ul Hasan A
    J Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 89(11):1887-93. PubMed ID: 21805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How facial attractiveness affects sustained attention.
    Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 57(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 27347672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.
    Chen J; Zhong J; Zhang Y; Li P; Zhang A; Tan Q; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 517(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22410307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Origins of a stereotype: categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants.
    Ramsey JL; Langlois JH; Hoss RA; Rubenstein AJ; Griffin AM
    Dev Sci; 2004 Apr; 7(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 15320380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of averageness on judgments of facial attractiveness: no own-age or own-sex advantage among children attending single-sex schools.
    Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Apr; 120():1-16. PubMed ID: 24326246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does facial attractiveness influence perception of epilepsy diagnosis? An insight into stigma in epilepsy.
    Ristić AJ; Jovanović O; Popadić D; Pađen V; Moosa ANV; Krivokapić A; Parojčić A; Berisavac I; Ilanković A; Baščarević V; Vojvodić N; Sokić D
    Epilepsy Behav; 2017 Dec; 77():1-7. PubMed ID: 29065282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labels affect both liking and preference: the better the stimuli, the bigger the preference.
    Zellner DA; Hoer K; Feldman J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2189-92. PubMed ID: 25239098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased hedonic differences despite increases in hedonic range.
    Zellner DA; Jones K; Morino J; Cogan ES; Jennings EM; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1261-5. PubMed ID: 20601708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of facial attractiveness on personality stimuli in an implicit priming task: an ERP study.
    Zhang Y; Zheng M; Wang X
    Neurol Res; 2016 Aug; 38(8):685-91. PubMed ID: 27268219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of position and context on facial attractiveness.
    Rodway P; Schepman A; Lambert J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 24140819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Men's judgments of women's facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar.
    Tigue CC; Pisanski K; O'Connor JJ; Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR
    J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23132932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Something to smile about: the interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression.
    Golle J; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 23875865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics.
    Jones AL; Kramer RS; Ward R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2060-8. PubMed ID: 24670156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences.
    Main JC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Jones BC
    Perception; 2010; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20301847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.