237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24689464)
1. Safety of less aggressive surgery for stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Lee JY; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24689464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study.
Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Landoni F; Zola P; Cosio S; Pasinetti B; Alessi C; Maneo A; Ferrero A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 14658592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and pathological findings of initial conization.
Yoshinaga M; Hamada T; Orita Y; Yoshitomi Shintomo N; Matsuo T; Tsuji T; Tabata K; Douchi T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1645-9. PubMed ID: 21790884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is conization once following by simple hysterectomy sufficient for all clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma?
Chen JR; Chiu ML; Wang TY; Chen TC; Wang KG; Su TH; Chang CL; Yang YC; Wang KL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 52(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 24075378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-tailored conservative surgical treatment of invasive uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma. A review.
Menczer J
Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Aug; 65(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24051940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of outcomes of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix by treatment type.
Reynolds EA; Tierney K; Keeney GL; Felix JC; Weaver AL; Roman LD; Cliby WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1150-7. PubMed ID: 20966701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix: treatment modalities.
Mota F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jun; 82(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 12780420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment and outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Haller H; Krašević M; Mamula O; Brnčić-Fischer A; Eminović S; Manestar M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 21315348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Pluta M; Rob L; Charvat M; Chmel R; Halaska M; Skapa P; Robova H
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 19264352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphadenectomy alone is a feasible option in managing incidentally-detected early-stage cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy without intermediate-risk factors: An application of the concept of less radical surgery.
Jeon HW; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
Anticancer Res; 2013 Nov; 33(11):5135-41. PubMed ID: 24222161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A case of parametrial lymph node involvement in stage IA2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and a review of the literature: a case report.
Billingsley CC; Kohler MF; Creasman WT; Madory JE; Young JL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Apr; 16(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 22227838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservative treatment of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy.
Yahata T; Numata M; Kashima K; Sekine M; Fujita K; Yamamoto T; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18289649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
