These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The process of a peer-reviewed journal. Pearson GS Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology. Brock WJ Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Support for peer review. Nat Immunol; 2010 Dec; 11(12):1063. PubMed ID: 21079625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance]. Kudaiberdieva G Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists. Gelenberg AJ J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review. Klein JS; Harmon SP; Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution. Biddle C AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The peer review process in health journals. Vettore MV Cad Saude Publica; 2009 Nov; 25(11):2306-7. PubMed ID: 19936469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. Kulstad E PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality? GarcĂa-Doval I PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What can CCR do for you? Potash J; Anderson KC Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Aug; 16(16):4069-70. PubMed ID: 20682715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The discourteous reviewer. Leviton A Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Submission of articles to Vaccine: a fast and fair peer review process. de Hon F; Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Jul; 31(32):3207-8. PubMed ID: 23726824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice. Jull G; Moore A Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Veterinary pathology and peer review. Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]