These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24689788)
1. Early discussion of breast density and supplemental breast cancer screening: is it possible? Cohen SL; Margolies LR; Schwager SJ; Zuckerman S; Patel N; Szabo J; Sonnenblick E Breast J; 2014; 20(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 24689788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supplemental Screening With Automated Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: Comparing Notification Methods and Screening Behaviors. Aripoli A; Fountain K; Winblad O; Gatewood J; Hill J; Wick JA; Inciardi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):W22-W28. PubMed ID: 29045183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening. Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Weigert J; Steenbergen S Breast J; 2015; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25683369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study. Sprague BL; Conant EF; Onega T; Garcia MP; Beaber EF; Herschorn SD; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN; Lacson R; Schnall MD; Kontos D; Haas JS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE; Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(7):457-464. PubMed ID: 27428568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Siu AL; Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 26757170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening? Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic Breast Density as a Predictor of Radiological Findings Requiring Further Investigation. Nevler A; Shabtai E; Rosin D; Hoffman A; Gutman M; Shabtai M Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 26964277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Breast Density Notification Laws on Supplemental Breast Imaging and Breast Biopsy. Saulsberry L; Pace LE; Keating NL J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1441-1451. PubMed ID: 31144277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone. Sprague BL; Ichikawa L; Eavey J; Lowry KP; Rauscher G; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Chen S; Lee JM; Stout NK; Mandelblatt JS; Alsheik N; Herschorn SD; Perry H; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K Cancer; 2023 Aug; 129(16):2456-2468. PubMed ID: 37303202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women. Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should This Woman With Dense Breasts Receive Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening?: Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Smetana GW; Elmore JG; Lee CI; Burns RB Ann Intern Med; 2018 Oct; 169(7):474-484. PubMed ID: 30285208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program. Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Parris T; Wakefield D; Frimmer H Breast J; 2013; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23240937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel. Freer PE; Slanetz PJ; Haas JS; Tung NM; Hughes KS; Armstrong K; Semine AA; Troyan SL; Birdwell RL Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Sep; 153(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 26290416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast density in screening mammography in Indian population - Is it different from western population? Singh T; Khandelwal N; Singla V; Kumar D; Gupta M; Singh G; Bal A Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):365-368. PubMed ID: 29139590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]