173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24689891)
1. Community composition affects the shape of mate response functions.
Symes LB
Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2005-13. PubMed ID: 24689891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conservation of multivariate female preference functions and preference mechanisms in three species of trilling field crickets.
Blankers T; Hennig RM; Gray DA
J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):630-41. PubMed ID: 25661511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
Gerhardt HC
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coevolution of male mating signal and female preference during early lineage divergence of the Hawaiian cricket, Laupala cerasina.
Grace JL; Shaw KL
Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2184-96. PubMed ID: 21790568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae: trigonidiinae: Laupala).
Mullen SP; Mendelson TC; Schal C; Shaw KL
Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):223-31. PubMed ID: 17300441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple post-mating barriers to hybridization in field crickets.
Tyler F; Harrison XA; Bretman A; Veen T; Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Tregenza T
Mol Ecol; 2013 Mar; 22(6):1640-9. PubMed ID: 23294288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets.
Shaw KL
Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1303-12. PubMed ID: 11005297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads.
Pfennig KS; Rice AM
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140949. PubMed ID: 24990680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach.
Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QTL analysis of a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala.
Shaw KL; Parsons YM; Lesnick SC
Mol Ecol; 2007 Jul; 16(14):2879-92. PubMed ID: 17614904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population.
Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Slate J; Walling CA; Tregenza T
Science; 2010 Jun; 328(5983):1269-72. PubMed ID: 20522773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION.
Ryan MJ; Rand AS
Evolution; 1993 Apr; 47(2):647-657. PubMed ID: 28568715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait.
Hunt J; Brooks R; Jennions MD
Am Nat; 2005 Jul; 166(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 15937791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phenotypic variation and covariation indicate high evolvability of acoustic communication in crickets.
Blankers T; Lübke AK; Hennig RM
J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1656-69. PubMed ID: 26134540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential aging of bite and jump performance in virgin and mated Teleogryllus commodus crickets.
Lailvaux SP; Zajitschek F; Dessman J; Brooks R
Evolution; 2011 Nov; 65(11):3138-47. PubMed ID: 22023581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
