155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24690620)
1. Attendance at cervical cancer screening and use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on the uterine cervix assessed from individual health insurance data (Belgium, 2002-2006).
Arbyn M; Fabri V; Temmerman M; Simoens C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92615. PubMed ID: 24690620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of 13 million individual patient records pertaining to Pap smears, colposcopies, biopsies and surgery on the uterine cervix (Belgium, 1996-2000).
Arbyn M; Simoens C; Van Oyen H; Foidart JM; Goffin F; Simon P; Fabri V
Prev Med; 2009 May; 48(5):438-43. PubMed ID: 19272405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abnormal Pap smears: a comparison of total abdominal hysterectomy and cone biopsy in management.
Onah HE; Iyoke CA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jan; 26(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 16390711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.
Katki HA; Kinney WK; Fetterman B; Lorey T; Poitras NE; Cheung L; Demuth F; Schiffman M; Wacholder S; Castle PE
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Jul; 12(7):663-72. PubMed ID: 21684207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening and subsequent procedures in women under the age of 25 years between 2007 and 2013 in France: a nationwide French healthcare database study.
Maura G; Chaignot C; Weill A; Alla F; Heard I
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 28368950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cancer screening and outcomes for women under 25 years of age in Belgium: a 10-year nationwide study.
Desimpel F; Declercq S; Makar A
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2023 Mar; 32(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 36134615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine cervix conization based on Pap smear results: the "see and treat" approach.
Meirovitz M; Gatt D; Dreiher J; Shaco-Levy R
Isr Med Assoc J; 2014 May; 16(5):303-6. PubMed ID: 24979836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort.
Kamineni A; Tiro JA; Beaber EF; Silverberg MJ; Wheeler CM; Chao CR; Chubak J; Skinner CS; Corley DA; Kim JJ; Balasubramanian BA; Paul Doria-Rose V;
Int J Cancer; 2019 Mar; 144(6):1460-1473. PubMed ID: 30353911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytological screening for cervical cancer in the province of Limburg, Belgium.
Arbyn M; Van Nieuwenhuyse A; Bogers J; De Jonge E; De Beeck LO; Matheï C; Buntinx F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20805755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Precancerous cervical lesions during pregnancy: diagnostic and treatment].
Selleret L; Mathevet P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S131-8. PubMed ID: 18191339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix be predicted before cervical conization?
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Prompittayarat W; Kanjanavaha P; Peuwsai R; Dheerakul C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(4):522-4. PubMed ID: 17250421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.
Doh AS; Nkele NN; Achu P; Essimbi F; Essame O; Nkegoum B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15847890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colposcopy, conization, and hysterectomy practices: a current perspective.
Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Simpson ML; Shaw D
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Nov; 60(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 7145247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Pap smear for mass screening: Results of an African experiment].
Somé OR; Zongo N; Ka S; Wardini R; Dem A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Jun; 44(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 27216960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of colposcopy in diagnosis of pre-cancer and cancer of the uterine cervix].
Hinkova N; Tsvetkov Ch; Tanchev L; Strateva D; Gorchev G
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 21427875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
