These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24691211)
1. UK peatland restoration: some economic arithmetic. Moxey A; Moran D Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():114-20. PubMed ID: 24691211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fighting carbon loss of degraded peatlands by jump-starting ecosystem functioning with ecological restoration. Kareksela S; Haapalehto T; Juutinen R; Matilainen R; Tahvanainen T; Kotiaho JS Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 537():268-76. PubMed ID: 26282761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option under the EU Nature Restoration Law. Jurasinski G; Barthelmes A; Byrne KA; Chojnicki BH; Christiansen JR; Decleer K; Fritz C; Günther AB; Huth V; Joosten H; Juszczak R; Juutinen S; Kasimir Å; Klemedtsson L; Koebsch F; Kotowski W; Kull A; Lamentowicz M; Lindgren A; Lindsay R; Linkevičienė R; Lohila A; Mander Ü; Manton M; Minkkinen K; Peters J; Renou-Wilson F; Sendžikaitė J; Šimanauskienė R; Taminskas J; Tanneberger F; Tegetmeyer C; van Diggelen R; Vasander H; Wilson D; Zableckis N; Zak DH; Couwenberg J Ambio; 2024 Jul; 53(7):970-983. PubMed ID: 38696060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A national riparian restoration programme in New Zealand: Is it value for money? Daigneault AJ; Eppink FV; Lee WG J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():166-177. PubMed ID: 27889659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the benefits of physical seabed restoration justify the costs? An assessment of a disused aggregate extraction site off the Thames Estuary, UK. Cooper K; Burdon D; Atkins JP; Weiss L; Somerfield P; Elliott M; Turner K; Ware S; Vivian C Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Oct; 75(1-2):33-45. PubMed ID: 24011661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of peatland drainage and restoration on Odonata species richness and abundance. Elo M; Penttinen J; Kotiaho JS BMC Ecol; 2015 Apr; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25888218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investing in sustainable catchments. Everard M Sci Total Environ; 2004 May; 324(1-3):1-24. PubMed ID: 15081693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A meta-analysis of the ecological and economic outcomes of mangrove restoration. Su J; Friess DA; Gasparatos A Nat Commun; 2021 Aug; 12(1):5050. PubMed ID: 34413296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biodiversity is central for restoration. Edwards DP; Cerullo GR Curr Biol; 2024 May; 34(9):R371-R379. PubMed ID: 38714168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ecological restoration of rich fens in Europe and North America: from trial and error to an evidence-based approach. Lamers LP; Vile MA; Grootjans AP; Acreman MC; van Diggelen R; Evans MG; Richardson CJ; Rochefort L; Kooijman AM; Roelofs JG; Smolders AJ Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):182-203. PubMed ID: 24698312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary assessment of the potential for, and limitations to, terrestrial negative emission technologies in the UK. Smith P; Haszeldine RS; Smith SM Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 27731875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ditch blocking, water chemistry and organic carbon flux: evidence that blanket bog restoration reduces erosion and fluvial carbon loss. Wilson L; Wilson J; Holden J; Johnstone I; Armstrong A; Morris M Sci Total Environ; 2011 May; 409(11):2010-8. PubMed ID: 21440287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biocapacity and cost-effectiveness benefits of increased peatland restoration in Scotland. Horsburgh N; Tyler A; Mathieson S; Wackernagel M; Lin D J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 306():114486. PubMed ID: 35065363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Macroinvertebrate community assembly in pools created during peatland restoration. Brown LE; Ramchunder SJ; Beadle JM; Holden J Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 569-570():361-372. PubMed ID: 27348701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transforming ecosystems: When, where, and how to restore contaminated sites. Rohr JR; Farag AM; Cadotte MW; Clements WH; Smith JR; Ulrich CP; Woods R Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Apr; 12(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 26033665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries. Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The adoption of sustainable remediation behaviour in the US and UK: a cross country comparison and determinant analysis. Hou D; Al-Tabbaa A; Guthrie P Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():905-13. PubMed ID: 24908650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecosystem service benefits and costs of deep-sea ecosystem restoration. Chen W; Wallhead P; Hynes S; Groeneveld R; O'Connor E; Gambi C; Danovaro R; Tinch R; Papadopoulou N; Smith C J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114127. PubMed ID: 34838382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulated climate change impact on summer dissolved organic carbon release from peat and surface vegetation: implications for drinking water treatment. Ritson JP; Bell M; Graham NJ; Templeton MR; Brazier RE; Verhoef A; Freeman C; Clark JM Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():66-76. PubMed ID: 25262551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]