These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24691308)

  • 1. A Simple Method for Proper Placement of the Inframammary Fold Incision in Primary Breast Augmentation.
    Aboelatta YA; Aboelatta H; Elgazzar K
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 24691308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.
    Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Ji K; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Comparison of Scars in Breast Implantation Surgery with Inframammary Fold Incision Versus Axillary Incision: A Prospective Cohort Study in Chinese Patients.
    Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 30607574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of breast augmentation incisions and common complications.
    Stutman RL; Codner M; Mahoney A; Amei A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1096-104. PubMed ID: 22653141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus Inframammary Approaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case-Control Study.
    Lee DW; Kim SJ; Kim H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 43(3):563-568. PubMed ID: 30911772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personal Approach to Optimizing Inframammary Fold Incision for Asian Augmentation Mammoplasty.
    Lai YW; Huang SH; Lee Y; Chen FM; Lai CS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Mar; 86(3S Suppl 2):S143-S147. PubMed ID: 33346556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Novel Classification of the Inframammary Fold for Use in Primary Breast Augmentation.
    Phillips NA; Millan LS; Miroshnik M; Stradwick L; Layt C
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Dec; 148(6):903e-914e. PubMed ID: 34644274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transaxillary endoscopic silicone gel breast augmentation.
    Strock LL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Sep; 30(5):745-55. PubMed ID: 20884907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of incision choice to capsular contracture.
    Wiener TC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Mar; 32(2):303-6. PubMed ID: 17994260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The pythagorean theorem as a tool for preoperative planning of a concealed scar in augmentation mammaplasty with round implants.
    Bouwer LR; Tielemans HJP; van der Lei B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):110-112. PubMed ID: 25539300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natrelle Style 510 in breast augmentation surgery.
    De Vita R; Buccheri EM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 23084647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique.
    Kolker AR; Austen WG; Slavin SA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 20395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: a comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches.
    Mofid MM; Klatsky SA; Singh NK; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1694-8. PubMed ID: 16651938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L; Ramírez-Macías R; ; ; ; ; ;
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 16404648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction of small volume breast asymmetry using deep parenchymal resection and identical silicone implants: an early experience.
    Somogyi RB; Stavrou D; Southwick G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25908698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chinese women's preferences and concerns regarding incision location for breast augmentation surgery: a survey of 216 patients.
    Sun J; Liu C; Mu D; Wang K; Zhu S; He Y; Luan J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Apr; 39(2):214-26. PubMed ID: 25701388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative assessment tool for the planning of inframammary incision and implant profile in breast augmentation.
    Atiyeh BS; Dibo SA; Nader M; Papazian NJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 38(5):878-86. PubMed ID: 25060928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.