These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24691504)
1. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy. Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing. Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High. Holden LK; Brenner C; Reeder RM; Firszt JB Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14(5):276-86. PubMed ID: 23683298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the ClearVoice Strategy in Adults Using HiResolution Fidelity 120 Sound Processing. Kam AC; Ng IH; Cheng MM; Wong TK; Tong MC Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-92. PubMed ID: 22701156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants. Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm. Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 26055839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Everyday listening questionnaire: correlation between subjective hearing and objective performance. Brendel M; Frohne-Buechner C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Buechner A Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 23998527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric Evaluation of the ClearVoice™ Speech Enhancement Algorithm in Everyday Life. Noël-Petroff N; Mathias N; Ulmann C; Abbeele TV Audiol Res; 2013 Jan; 3(1):e9. PubMed ID: 26557346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users. Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings. James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation: prospective study in adults. Koch DB; Soli SD; Downing M; Osberger MJ Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11(2):84-99. PubMed ID: 19247979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution. Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Smulders YE; van Zon A; Stegeman I; Rinia AB; Van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Hendrice N; Free RH; Maat B; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; Mylanus EA; Huinck WJ; Smit AL; Topsakal V; Tange RA; Grolman W JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 26796630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]