111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24691624)
1. Screening by mammography.
Shimkin MB
JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1362. PubMed ID: 24691624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening mammography.
Prescrire Int; 2006 Oct; 15(85):192-3. PubMed ID: 17128530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography and the politics of randomised controlled trials.
Wells J
BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7167):1224-9. PubMed ID: 9794866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography: better, safer, and more effective?
Linton OW; Schauer DA
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 16793970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Mammography in the USA].
Linton OW
J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 75(10):493-6. PubMed ID: 7799270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [History of mammography in Hungary].
Tóth E
Orv Hetil; 1999 May; 140(21):1204. PubMed ID: 10380548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Public health. Brawling over mammography.
Marshall E
Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5968):936-8. PubMed ID: 20167758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials.
Cox B
Cancer; 1996 Aug; 78(3):572-3. PubMed ID: 8697411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Novel data on mammography: invitation to organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality].
Schulz-Wendtland R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):52. PubMed ID: 11977394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary: screening mammography: a decision analysis.
Berry D
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 33(1):68; discussion 69-73. PubMed ID: 15075148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness: the next question for breast cancer screening.
Harris R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1021-3. PubMed ID: 16030293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Experts at odds over mammography.
Cimons M
Nat Med; 2002 Mar; 8(3):202. PubMed ID: 11875479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
Pace LE; Keating NL
JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of mammography.
Bassett LW; Gold RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 3277343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Brief history of mammography in Hungary and its development until the present day].
Székely M
Orv Hetil; 1999 Feb; 140(6):297-9. PubMed ID: 10071510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer.
Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 33(1):56-64; discussion 69-73. PubMed ID: 15075145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography at 40-49 years: regret or no regret?
Djulbegovic B; Lyman GH
Lancet; 2006 Dec; 368(9552):2035-7. PubMed ID: 17161713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [75th anniversary of the first mammography].
Semiglazov VF; Vesnin AG
Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 2648679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [40 years of progress in breast imaging].
De Maulmont C; Cherel P; Ouhioun O; Becette V; Stevens D; Plantet MM; Hagay C
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2000 Nov; 48(9):801-11. PubMed ID: 11141915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mammography consensus jury speaks out.
Nelson NJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Mar; 89(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 9060955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
