292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24691838)
1. Dose management for X-ray and CT: systematic comparison of exposition values from two institutes to diagnostic reference levels and use of results for optimisation of exposition.
Schäfer S; Alejandre-Lafont E; Schmidt T; Gizewski ER; Fiebich M; Krombach GA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):785-94. PubMed ID: 24691838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cloud-Based CT Dose Monitoring using the DICOM-Structured Report: Fully Automated Analysis in Regard to National Diagnostic Reference Levels.
Boos J; Meineke A; Rubbert C; Heusch P; Lanzman RS; Aissa J; Antoch G; Kröpil P
Rofo; 2016 Mar; 188(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 26632871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of Whole-Body CT Examinations of Polytrauma Patients in Comparison with the Current Diagnostic Reference Levels.
Schäfer SB; Rudolph C; Kolodziej M; Mauermann F; Roller FC; Krombach GA
Rofo; 2019 Nov; 191(11):1015-1025. PubMed ID: 30999381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A strategy to optimize radiation exposure for non-contrast head CT: comparison with the Japanese diagnostic reference levels.
Kumamaru KK; Kogure Y; Suzuki M; Hori M; Nakanishi A; Kamagata K; Hagiwara A; Andica C; Ri K; Houshido N; Aoki S
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 27097808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-dose computed tomography of the lumbar spine: a phantom study on imaging parameters and image quality.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 24215904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assurance in CT: implementation of the updated national diagnostic reference levels using an automated CT dose monitoring system.
Appel E; Kröpil P; Bethge OT; Aissa J; Thomas C; Antoch G; Boos J
Clin Radiol; 2018 Jul; 73(7):677.e13-677.e20. PubMed ID: 29567269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance.
Lurz M; Lell MM; Wuest W; Eller A; Scharf M; Uder M; May MS
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):352-60. PubMed ID: 25591129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient doses in CT examinations in 18 countries: initial results from International Atomic Energy Agency projects.
Muhogora WE; Ahmed NA; Beganovic A; Benider A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Gershan V; Gershkevitsh E; Grupetta E; Kharita MH; Manatrakul N; Milakovic M; Ohno K; Ben Omrane L; Ptacek J; Schandorf C; Shabaan MS; Stoyanov D; Toutaoui N; Wambani JS; Rehani MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 19687134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Size-specific dose estimates of adult, chest computed tomography examinations: Comparison of Chinese and updated 2017 American College of Radiology diagnostic reference levels based on the water-equivalent diameter.
Hu X; Gou J; Lin W; Zou C; Li W
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257294. PubMed ID: 34516579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation.
Mulkens TH; Bellinck P; Baeyaert M; Ghysen D; Van Dijck X; Mussen E; Venstermans C; Termote JL
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 16126917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Patients' X-ray Exposure in 146 Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomies.
Petersen TO; Reinhardt M; Fuchs J; Gosch D; Surov A; Stumpp P; Kahn T; Moche M
Rofo; 2017 Sep; 189(9):820-827. PubMed ID: 28609790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Using diagnostic reference levels to evaluate the improvement of patient dose optimisation and the influence of recent technologies in radiography and computed tomography.
Roch P; Célier D; Dessaud C; Etard C
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():68-74. PubMed ID: 29279172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS OF RADIOGRAPHIC AND CT EXAMINATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
Alrehily F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Oct; 198(19):1451-1461. PubMed ID: 36125219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Single-slice and multi-slice computerized tomography: dosimetric comparison with diagnostic reference dose levels].
Moro L; Bolsi A; Baldi M; Bertoli G; Fantinato D
Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 11740455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality criteria implementation for brain and lumbar spine CT examinations.
Calzado A; Rodríguez R; Muñoz A
Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):384-95. PubMed ID: 10844864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indication-based diagnostic reference levels for adult CT-examinations in Finland.
Lajunen A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):95-7. PubMed ID: 25821213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.
Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Jun; 26(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 16738417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT with Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Software.
MacGregor K; Li I; Dowdell T; Gray BG
Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):507-17. PubMed ID: 25897474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic reference levels of paediatric computed tomography examinations performed at a dedicated Australian paediatric hospital.
Bibbo G; Brown S; Linke R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):475-84. PubMed ID: 27378436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
