These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24692250)
21. [Meta-analysis of therapeutic and preventive clinical trials]. Lugosi L; Molnár I Orv Hetil; 2000 Dec; 141(51):2779-84. PubMed ID: 11196238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity. Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations. Cheung MW; Cheung SF Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):140-55. PubMed ID: 27286900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis]. Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Meta-analysis for evidence synthesis in plant pathology: an overview. Madden LV; Paul PA Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21142781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Viechtbauer W Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Statistical Models and Methods for Network Meta-Analysis. Madden LV; Piepho HP; Paul PA Phytopathology; 2016 Aug; 106(8):792-806. PubMed ID: 27111798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Conducting a meta-analysis: basics and good practices. Cheung MW; Ho RC; Lim Y; Mak A Int J Rheum Dis; 2012 Apr; 15(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 22462415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression. Sidik K; Jonkman JN J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation. Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses. Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Meta-analysis in evidence-based healthcare: a paradigm shift away from random effects is overdue. Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L; Thalib L; Barendregt JJ Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2017 Dec; 15(4):152-160. PubMed ID: 29135532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sparse meta-analysis with high-dimensional data. He Q; Zhang HH; Avery CL; Lin DY Biostatistics; 2016 Apr; 17(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 26395907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic. Ma Y; Mazumdar M Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]